Indian Penal Code 500+ MCQs for All State Judiciary Exams
1. When did the Indian Penal Code received the Governor General’s
assent?
A. October 3, 1850
B. October 5, 1852
C. October 6, 1860
D. October 7, 1865
Ans: C
2. Wrongful confinement in secret is dealt under
A. Section 344 of IPC
B. Section 345 of IPC
C. Section 346 of IPC
D. Section 347 of IPC
Ans: C
3. After the submission of the draft of the Indian Penal Code in
1837, who reviewed the draft Code?
A. Sri Barnes Peacock
B. Sri Rajgopalachari
C. Sir. J. W. Colvile
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans: D
4. The right to prosecution under the Indian Penal Code:
A. is affected by the provisions of other statutes
B. is not affected by the
provisions of the other statutes
C. is not applicable under the provisions of the Companies Act
D. is not applicable in the areas of Mikir Hills
Ans: B
5. Intercourse by a man with his wife during separation is dealt
under
A. Section 374 A of IPC
B. Section 375 A of IPC
C. Section 376 A of IPC
D. Section 377 A of IPC
Ans: C
6. All are true except one concerning the duty of the Court in regard
to the interpretation of the words of ambiguous import in a penal statute?
A. The court must ascertain if the offence charged is within the
meaning of the words of the statute
B. If the only reasonable way of construing a penal statute
without stretching its legal language is one, which goes against the accused,
then it must be fully upheld in its entirety.
C. It is the duty of the Court to interpret words of ambiguous
import in a broad and liberal sense
D. In case of penal statute is uncertain or ambiguous or at
capable of two interpretations, the benefit of the ambiguity should go to the
accused
Ans: B
7. Intercourse by public servant with woman in his custody is
dealt under
A. Section 373 B of IPC
B. Section 374 B of IPC
C. Section 375 B of IPC
D. Section 376 B of IPC
Ans: D
8. Extortion by threat of accusation of an offence punishable with
death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for ten years is dealt under
A. Section 385 of IPC
B. Section 386 of IPC
C. Section 387 of IPC
D. Section 388 of IPC
Ans: D
9. Mens rea involves:
A. crimes of basic intent
B. crimes of speculative intent
C. crimes of specific intent
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans: D
10. The accused booked two cases containing heroin on a flight
from City A to City B and then to City C. On reaching City C, he did not
collect the heroin. He was charged with being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent
evasion of restrictions on importation of cannabis under customs and excise
laws. He was held guilty of the offence charged as he has brought about the
importation by deliberate actions committed with a guilty intent. The accused
took the victim to a hut and killed him striking over his head. In order to
make it an accidental death the dead body was rolled over a cliff. The medical
report revealed that death was due to exposure and it was not caused in the
hut.
A. The accused is guilty of murder in both the cases
B. The accused is not guilty in the first case however is guilty
of manslaughter in the second case
C. The accused is not guilty in neither of the cases
D. The accused is guilty in the first case and not in the second
case
Ans: B
11. Fraudulent removal or concealment of property, etc to prevent
distribution among creditors is dealt under
A. Section 421 of IPC
B. Section 422 of IPC
C. Section 423 of IPC
D. Section 424 of IPC
Ans: A
12. C and F and F invited C to have a fix of his heroin. Each
filled his own syringe and injected each other several times during one night.
Next morning F died on the question of causation:
A. C must convicted of
manslaughter
B. C must not be convicted of manslaughter
C. C can be convicted for the possession of heroin only
D. C is neither guilty of possessing heroin nor the death of
F
Ans: A
13. The accused in order to evade arrest was holding D against her
will and was using her body as a shield. He fired a shotgun at the police
officer who returned the fire in which D was killed. Which the following should
be the first step of the Court on the question of causation?
A. The Court must immediately convict the accused
B. The Court must direct the jury to be sure that the accused
fired the first shot
C. The police officer must be convicted
D. Both (A) and (B)
Ans: D
14. Assisting concealment or disposal of stolen property knowing
it to be stolen is dealt under
A. Section 411 of IPC
B. Section 412 of IPC
C. Section 413 of IPC
D. Section 414 of IPC
Ans: D
15. All except one is false statement about legal mens rea:
A. it refers to mental element necessary for the particular crime
B. the mental element may be either intention to do the immediate
act or bring about the consequences
C. intention or recklessness as to the elements constituting the
actus reus
D. intention can always be satisfactorily defined
Ans: D
16. Mischief is dealt under
A. Section 426 of IPC
B. Section 427 of IPC
C. Section 428 of IPC
D. Section 429 of IPC
Ans: A
17. To which of the following, the law of presumption applies?
A. volenti non fit injura
B. mens rea
C. de minimus non curat lex
D. none of them
Ans: B
18. What is the position of the mens rea in its purely technical
sense for the offences under the Indian Penal Code?
A. it holds the same position as it does under the English
Criminal Law
B. it has no application
C. it has indirect application
D. both (B) and (C).
Ans: D
19. Lurking house trepass or house-breaking is dealt under
A. Section 452 of IPC
B. Section 453 of IPC
C. Section 454 of IPC
D. Section 455 of IPC
Ans: B
20. Punishment for subjecting a married woman to cruelty is dealt
under
A. Section 497 of IPC
B. Section 498 of IPC
C. Section 498AofIPC
D. Section 500 of IPC
Ans: C
21. Which of the following is a type of legal fault that necessarily
does not involve a mental state?
A. Negligence
B. Intention
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. None of them
Ans: A
22. Which of the following introduced Section 10-C of the IPC?
A. Amendment Act 10 of 1972
B. Amendment Act 30 of 1974
C. Amendment Act’ 40 of 1976
D. Amendment Act 42 of 1980
Ans: B
23. Presumption of culpable mental state is a part of:
A. Section 7-C of the IPC
B. Section 8-C of the IPC
C. Section 9-C of the IPC
D. Section 10-C of the IPC
Ans: D
24. Death or grievous hurt caused by one of several persons
jointly concerned in house breaking by night, etc is dealt under
A. Section 45 8 of IPC
B. Section 459 of IPC
C. Section 460 of IPC
D. Section 461 of IPC
Ans: C
25. Section 10-C was used in which of the following cases?
A. Devaki v. State (Kerala 2000)
B. Devamani v. State (Madras 1983)
C. Devraj v. State of Punjab (1992)
D. Devilal v. State (Delhi administration 1986)
Ans: B
26. A man by deceit causing a woman not lawfully married to him to
believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit with him in that
behalf is dealt under
A Section 493 of IPC
B. Section 494 of IPC
C. Section 495 of IPC
D. Section 496 of IPC
Ans: A
27. All except one is false of the crimes that do not require
legal fault on the part of the accused.
A. quasi criminal cases which are prohibited in public interest
under a penalty
B. cases of public nuisance, libel and contempt of court
C. cases with criminal proceeding but is a mode of enforcing a
civil right
D. cases of domestic violence
Ans: D
28. In which of the following conditions a corporation can be
prosecuted?
A. if it is a person under Section 10 of the Penal Code
B. if it is a person under Section 11 of the Penal Code
C. if it is a person under Section 12 of the Penal Code
D. if it is a person under Section 14 of the Penal Code
Ans: B
29. The maxim of law impontia excusat legam is intimately
connected with which maxim of law.
A. lex cogit adimpossiblis
B. lex non ad impossiblis
C. lex non cogit ad impossiblis
D. lex actus reus impossiblis
Ans: C
30. Two brothers sleeping on the floor of a room. The victim was
done to death admittedly by the accused around midnight with a dao when the
victim was in deep slumber. The defence stated that the accused in his dream
was being throttled by someone so he took out the dao kept the head of the bed
to apprehend his attacker. However the dao hit his brother and killed him.
A. The accused must be convicted under criminal liability
B. The accused must be absolved from criminal liability
C. it is a case of automatism
D. both (B) and (C)
Ans: D
31. In which of the following case regarding the ‘degree of proof
‘ and ‘reasonable doubt’ the Supreme Court has held that: “In a criminal trial
the degree of proof is stricter than what is required in a civil proceeding. In
criminal trial however intriguing may be facts and circumstances of the case,
the charges made against the accused must be proved beyond all reasonable
doubt, does not stand altered even after the introduction of Section 498-A
I.P.C and Section 113-A of Indian Evidence Act___________The doubt must of
reasonable man and the standard adopted must be a standard adopted by a
reasonable and just man for coming to a conclusion considering the particular
subject matter.”
A. State of West Bengal v. Orilal Jaiswal (1994)
B. Inder Singh v. State (Delhi Administration) (1978)
C. Uma Shankar v. State of UP (1979)
D. Dhram Das Dadhwani v. State of UP (1974)
Ans: A
32. Marrying again during the lifetime of a husband or wife is
dealt under
A. Section 493 of IPC
B. Section 494 of IPC
C. Section 495 of IPC
D. Section 496 of IPC
Ans: B
33. Regarding ‘reasonableness of doubt’ in which of the following
case the Supreme Court indicated: “That the conscience of the Court can never
be bound by any rule but that is coming itself dictates the consciousness and
prudent exercise of the judgement. Reasonable doubt is simply that degree of
doubt which would permit a reasonable and just man to come to conclusion.
Reasonableness of the doubt be commensurate with the nature of the offence to
be investigated__________ Letting guilty is not doing justice, according to the
law”
A. Gurbachan Singh v. Satpal Singh (1990)
B. Nagar Swasthya Adhikari v. Kishan Singh (1969)
C. Ashrubindu Ray v. Chittaranjan Banerjee (1978)
D. None of them
Ans: A
34. Making or counterfeiting a seal, plate, etc, with intent to
commit a forgery punishable otherwise than under section 467 of the Indian
Penal Code, or possessing with like intent any such seal plate, etc, knowing
the same to be counterfeit is dealt under
A. Section 471 of IPC
B. Section 472 of IPC
C. Section 473 of IPC
D. Section 474 of IPC
Ans: C
35. In case same set of facts attracts a civil suit and also a
criminal trial, what should be done?
A. The civil suit should be stayed
B. The criminal case should be stayed
C. The civil suit should be quashed
D. Both should be simultaneously carried out
Ans: A
36. Act caused by inducing a person to believe that he will be
rendered an object of Divine displeasure is dealt under
A. Section 506 of IPC
B. Section 507 of IPC
C. Section 508 of IPC
D. Section 509 of IPC
Ans: C
37. Which of the following is a fundamental maxim of natural
justice?
A. audi alteram partem
B. nullum tempus occurritregi
C. memo debet esse judex in propria causa sua
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans: D
38. As far as complaints are concerned, at which of the following
stage summons are issued?
A. Section 202 of Cr. PC
B. Section 203 of Cr. PC
C. Section 204 of Cr. PC
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans: C
39. X was accused of a criminal offence by Y and the case pended
on for 12 years, during which not a single witness was produced by the
prosecution. Which of the following article of the Constitution of India in
this case was violated?
A. Article 12, Constitution of India
B. Article 15, Constitution of India
C. Article 21, Constitution of India
D. Article 25, Constitution of India
Ans: C
40. Criminal intimidation is dealt under
A. Section 506 of IPC
B. Section 507 of IPC
C. Section 508 of IPC
D. Section 509 of IPC
Ans: A
41. Mr. X was prosecuted for importing gold into India in contravention
of Section 8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 read with the
notification there under. It was argued that notification dated November 8,
1962 and that the accused could have no idea about as it was published in the
Gazette of India while the accused left his country on November 27, 1962.
A. the contention must be upheld as the plea of ignorance is valid
B. the contention must be repelled as the plea of ignorance is not
valid
C. the case must be upheld because accused is a foreign national
D. None of them
Ans: B
42. House-trespass in order to the commission of an offence
punishable with imprisonment for life is dealt under
A. Section 448 of IPC
B. Section 449 of IPC
C. Section 450 of IPC
D. Section 451 of IPC
Ans: C
43. In a certain case in the High Court an advocate made a
complaint against A, a Sub-Inspector of Police that A in course of
investigation of a few cases against F in official capacity oppressed him in
the exercise of his official capacity which was offence under Section 124
Government of India Act 1910.
A. the High Court have the jurisdiction to summon and punish the
delinquent
B. the High Court does not have the jurisdiction to summon and
punish the delinquent
C. the High Court have the jurisdiction only to summon the
delinquent
D. none of them
Ans: B
44. Which of the following are always exempted from the
jurisdiction of criminal courts of every country?
A. Foreign sovereigns and ambassadors
B. Alien enemies, foreign army and warships
C. Presidents and Governors
D. All of them
Ans: D
45. Mischief with intent to destroy or make unsafe a decked vessel
or a vessel of 20 tonnes burden is dealt under
A. Section 434 of IPC
B. Section 435 of IPC
C. Section 436 of IPC
D. Section 437 of IPC
Ans: D
46. Which of the following Section of the IPC relate to extraterritorial
operations of the Code?
A. Section 2 and Section 3
B. Section 3 and Section 4
C. Section 2 and Section 3
D. Section 2 and Section 4
Ans: B
47. Kidnapping for ransom, etc is dealt under
A. Section 361 A of IPC
B. Section 362 A of IPC
C. Section 363 A of IPC
D. Section 364 A of IPC
Ans: D
48. To which of the following section does the Section 4 of the
IPC applies?
A. any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India
B. any person on ship or aircraft registered India wherever it may
be
C. Both of (A) and (B)
D. None of them
Ans: C
49. Appellant’s son was married to the complainants and appellant
was undisputedly a Mauritius citizen and her son and daughter-in-law were
residing in Kuwait. A complaint petition was filed before the chief judicial
magistrate XYZ by complainant alleging therein mental torture and physical
harassment by her husband. Appellant (mother-in- law of the complainant) who
was also made a party filed an application for quashing of proceeding on the
ground that cognizance taken by the magistrate was bad in law as she was
Mauritius citizen and the alleged offence was committed in Kuwait where only
cause of action had arisen:
A. The entire proceeding as been illegally initiated and without
jurisdiction and actions taken by the court is liable to be nullified
B. The cognizance taken by the magistrate and the process issued
is in order
C. Only the principle of res judicata will apply in such case
D. None of them
Ans: A
50. Fraudulently marking a false mark upon any package or
receptacle containing goods, with intent to cause it to be believed that it
contains goods which ir does not contain etc is dealt under
A. Section 485 of IPC
B. Section 486 of IPC
C. Section 487 of IPC
D. Section 488 of IPC
Ans: C
51. Piracy covers:
A. jure gentium
B. statute law of England
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. None of them
Ans: C
52. Making or using documents resembling currency-notes or bank
notes is dealt under
A. Section 489 D of IPC
B. Section 489 E of IPC
C. Section 490 of IPC
D. Section 491 of IPC
Ans: B
53. Being bound to attend on or supply the wants of a person who
is helpless from youth, unsoundness of mind or disease, and voluntarily
omitting to do so is dealt under
A. Section 489 D of IPC
B. Section 489 E of IPC
C. Section 490 of IPC
D. Section 491 of IPC
Ans: D
54. Acts A, B and C constitute an offence under the Prevention of
Corruption Act and the same acts A, B and C constitute an offence under
Section 408, Penal Code. Therefore:
A. the offender can be punished under both the Acts
B. the offender cannot be punished at all
C. the offender can be punished under either of the Acts but not
both
D. none of them
Ans: C
55. Extortion by threat of accusations of an offence punishable
with death imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for ten years and if the
offence threatened be an unnatural offence is dealt under
A. Section 388 of IPC
B. Section 389 of IPC
C. Section 390 of IPC
D. Section 391 of IPC
Ans: A
56. Robbery if committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise
is dealt under
A. Section 390 of IPC
B. Section 391 of IPC
C. Section 392 of IPC
D. Section 393 of IPC
Ans: C
57. Which Section of the IPC should be read as provision to
Section 105 of the Evidence Act?
A. Section 5 of IPC
B. Section 4 of IPC
C. Section 3 and 5 IPC
D. Section 6 of IPC
Ans: D
58. Using a false property mark with inten to deceive or injure
any person is dealt under
A. Section 480 of IPC
B. Section 481 of IPC
C. Section 482 of IPC
D. Section 483 of IPC
Ans: C
59. Which of the following explains the ‘sense of expression once
explained’?
A. Section 6 and Section 7 of IPC
B. Section 6 of IPC
C. Section 7 of IPC
D. None of them
Ans: C
60. Which of the following is a limitation with vicarious liability?
A. certain crimes because of their nature cannot be committed by a
corporation
B. corporal punishment cannot be imposed on a corporation
C. cannot be convicted of manslaughter
D. both (A) and (C)
Ans: D
61. Criminal liability of a corporation arises when:
A. an offence is committed in the course of corporation’s business
by the person in control of its affairs
B. an offence is committed in the course of corporation’s business
by a person in control whose thought and intent becomes thought and intent of
the corporation
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. None of them
Ans: C
62. Extortion by a putting a person in fear of death or grievous
is dealt under
A. Section 385 of IPC
B. Section 386 of IPC
C. Section 387 of IPC
D. Section 388 of IPC
Ans: B
63. Which of the following is true is of the word “Judge” under
Section 19 of IPC?
A. denotes a person officially designated as a Judge
B. denotes every person who is empowered by law to give a
definitive judgment in any legal proceeding, civil or criminal
C. denotes of a body of persons which is empowered by the law to
give judgment
D. all of them
Ans: D
64. Person voluntarily causing hurt in committing or attempting
to commit robbery, or any other person jointly concerned in such robbery is
dealt under
A. Section 394 of IPC
B. Section 395 of IPC
C. Section 396 of IPC
D. Section 397 of IPC
Ans: A
65. Which of the following does not fall under the category of the
word “Judge” as coined in Section 19?
A. Magistrate
B. Member of a Panchayat
C. Collector
D. Businessman
Ans: D
66. Which of the following amendment added Clause 11 and
Explanation 4 in Section 21 of IPC?
A. Act XXXIX, 1920
B. Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950
C. Act II, 1950
D. Anti-Corruption Act, 1964
Ans: B
67. In which of the following case the principle was held by the
Supreme Court that where a subsequent Act incorporates provisions of a
previous act, the burrowed provisions become an integral and independent part
of the subsequent Act and are totally unaffected by any repeal or amendment in
the Prevention Act, does not apply?
A. where the subsequent Act and the previous Act are supplemental
to each other
B. where the two Acts are pari material and where the amendment of
the previous Act either expressly or by necessary intendment, applies the said
provisions to the subsequent Act
C. where the amendment in the previous Act if not imported into
the subsequent Act would render the Act unworkable and ineffectual
D. all of them
Ans: D
68. Which of the following is not relevant to the practice and
procedures of Section 22 of IPC?
A. does not provide definition of “public servant”
B. no court can take cognizance of any offence against a public
servant except with the previous sanction of the Central Government or the
State Government as per the provisions of Section 197 Cr. P.C
C. the protection is available to a person, if on the date of
commission of offence he was public servant irrespective of his subsequent
retirement, resignation, dismissal or even removal
D. deals with extra territorial applicability but does not define
any substantive offence or procedure
Ans: D
69. X is an owner of a property and he owe some money to Y. X has
not been able to pay the due and Y forcibly took possession of his property
against his will to pressurise him into paying up his debts.
A. Y has all the authority to do so
B. X no longer has right over his property
C.Y is guilty of theft
D. None of them
Ans: C
70. In a certain case in Delhi the accused proposed marriage of
his son with the gentleman of a daughter who was pregnant with someone else’s
child (a fact that has not been concealed). However he concealed the fact that
his son is suffering from a mental disorder the gentleman marries his daughter
to his son then the accused:
A. cannot be hold guilty because even the gentleman’s daughter is
at fault
B. is prima facie guilty of cheating due to the element of
wrongful gain involved
C. cannot be accused as it the gentleman’s responsible to the
ascertain complete fact concerning the would be bridegroom
D. none of them
Ans: B
71. Oral threat or inducement allegedly given by lawyers to
approver not to give any statement against accused:
(a) amounts to commission of offence
(b) does not amount to commission of offence
(c) can attract discretion of the court to consider as offence
(d) none of the above.
Ans. (b)
72. Theft under section 379 IPC is not tenable if:
(a) property is not a movable property
(b) property cannot be moved in order to such taking
(c) subject-matter is not a property
(d) both (a) & (b).
Ans. (d)
73. If the appellants are liable to be convicted only for their
individual acts then:
(a) section 34 IPC can be invoked
(b) section 34 IPC cannot be invoked
(c) section 149 IPC can be invoked
(d) section 149 IPC cannot be invoked.
Ans. (b)
74. When all the incriminating facts and circumstances are found
to be incompatible with the innocence of the accused then:
(a) the inference of guilt can be justified
(b) the inference of guilt cannot be justified
(c) benefit of doubt should be given
(d) none of the above.
Ans. (a)
75. In which case the Supreme Court held that if a student and
teacher fall in love with each other, it does not mean that the teacher has
taken undue advantage of his official position:
(a) Geejaganda Somaiah v. State of Karnataka (2007)
(b) Sanjay v. State of Maharashtra (2007)
(c) Omkar Prasad Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2007)
(d) Kailash v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2007)
Ans. (c)
76. Under the Indian Penal Code who among the following is liable
for committing theft:
(a) child below 7 years of age
(b) child below 8 years of age
(c) child between 7 and 10 years of age
(d) child between 7 and 12 years of age having maturity of
understanding.
Ans. (d)
77. Under the general principle of Criminal Law, the jurisdiction
to try a person for an offence depends upon:
(a) place where such person is found
(b) place where crime committed within local area
(c) the nationality of the offender
(d) none of the above.
Ans. (b)
78. The imprisonment for the offence of molestation under IPC
amounts to:
(a) imprisonment upto 2 years
(b) imprisonment upto 1 year
(c) imprisonment upto 6 months
(d) imprisonment upto 3 months
Ans. (a)
79. In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that
“Doctors cannot be held guilty only because something has gone wrong”:
(a) Maniben v. State of Gujarat, AIR 2010 SC 1261
(b) Southern Railway Officer v. Union of India, AIR 2010 SC 1241
(c) Tameswar v. Ramvishal, AIR 2010 SC 1209
(d) Malaya Kumar Ganguly v. Sukumar, AIR 2010 SC 1162.
Ans. (d)
80. As per section 195A of IPC which was inserted by the Criminal
Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 the offence of threatening any person to give false
evidence, is punishable with:
(a) imprisonment upto 7 years or with fine or with both
(b) imprisonment upto 5 years or with fine or with both
(c) imprisonment upto 3 years or with fine or with both
(d) imprisonment upto 1 year or with fine or with both
Ans. (a)
81. As per section 153AA of IPC, which was inserted by the Code of
Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005, the punishment for knowingly carrying
arms in any procession or organising or holding or taking part in any mass
drill or mass training with arms, is punishable with:
(a) imprisonment upto 6 months and with fine upto Rs. 2,000
(b) imprisonment upto 3 months and with fine upto Rs. 2,000
(c) imprisonment upto 2 months and with fine upto Rs. 2,000
(d) imprisonment upto 1 month and with fine upto Rs. 2,000.
Ans. (a)
82. The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009)
with effect from 27 October, 2009 which amended the Indian Penal Code in
section 464, substituted “Electronic Signature” for:
(a) Digital signature
(b) Documentary Evidence
(c) Digital certificate
(d) Electronically certified signature.
Ans. (a)
83. “A” gave poisoned “Halwa” (sweet dish) to “B” with intention
to kill him. “B” ate one spoon and kept it on the side. “C” who was sitting
there, picked up and ate it. “C” dies. Here “A” is guilty of:
(a) Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
(b) Offence of murder of “C”
(c) Here “A” is not guilty of murder as he never intended to kill
“C”
(d) Causing grievous hurt.
Ans. (b)
84. The term “Harbour” defined under Indian Penal Code, 1860, does
not include:
(a) Supplying a person with shelter
(b) Supplying a person means of conveyance
(c) Assisting a person to evade apprehension
(d) Prior to the commission of the offence, facilitating the
commission thereof.
Ans. (d)
85. When a women was taking bath in her bathroom, “X” captures the
image in his mobile and upload it on her facebook page. What offence has been
committed by “X”:
(a) Sexual assault
(b) Insulting the modesty of a woman
(c) Voyeurism
(d) Stalking.
Ans. (c)
86. Read the following:
(1) There is either theft or extortion in robbery
(2) The offence of theft becomes robbery when it is coupled with
danger to life.
Of the above:
(a) (1) is true but (2) is false.
(b) (1) is false but (2) is true,
(c) (1) and (2) both are true.
(d) (1) and (2) both are false.
Ans. (c)
87. Read the following:
(1) Indian Courts have jurisdiction to try crime committed by an
Indian in a foreign country.
(2) Indian Courts do not have jurisdiction to try crime committed
by a foreigner in India.
Of the above:
(a) (1) is true but (2) is false.
(b) (1) is false but (2) is true.
(c) Both (1) and (2) are true.
(d) Both (1) and (2) are false.
Ans. (c)
88. Read the following:
(1) The maxim “Actus me invito factus non est mens acts” finds
application in Section 94 of I.P.C.
(2) The maxim “diminmis non curat lex” has been incorporated in
Section 95 of I.P.C.
Of the above:
(a) (1) is true but (2) is false.
(b) (1) is false but (2) is true.
(c) Both (1) and (2) are true.
(d) Both (1) and (2) are false.
Ans. (c)
89. In which case the Supreme Court of India has said that the
time has come when Section 309 of the I.P.C. should be deleted by Parliament:
(a) Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India
(b) Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab
(c) Both of the above
(d) None of the above.
Ans. (a)
90. ‘Z’ is carried off by a tiger. ‘A’ fires at the tiger knowing
it to be likely that the shot may kill Z but not intending to kill Z; and in
good faith intending Z’s benefit. A’s bullet gives Z a mortal wound. A shall be
guilty of:
(a) Murder
(b) Culpable homicides not amounting to murder
(c) Causing death by accident
(d) No offence.
Ans. (d)
91. In which of the following cases, recently the Supreme
Court has upheld the constitutional validity of a criminal statute in
“offences against the order of the nature”:
(a) National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
(b) Charu Khurana v. Union of India
(c) Jaya Bhaduri v. Union of India
(d) Suresh Kumar Khushal v. Naz Foundation.
Ans. (d)
92. Robbery is dacoity when the minimum number of persons
committing robbery is:
(a) 10 persons
(b) 5 persons
(c) 6 persons
(d) 4 persons.
Ans. (b)
93. Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India, (2014) 3 SCC 1 is the
case related to:
(a) giving false evidence before the court
(b) waging war against the state
(c) commutation of death sentence to life imprisonment
(d) none of the above.
Ans. (c)
94. ‘A’ claiming to be a family planning expert gave ‘X’ some
chemical. After consuming the chemical, the child in the womb of ‘X’ dies in
the womb. ‘A’ has committed:
(a) No offence
(b) Offence of murder
(c) Offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder
(d) Offence of causing miscarriage.
Ans. (d)
95. ‘A’ by falsely pretending to be in the civil service,
intentionally deceives ‘Z’, and thus dishonestly induces ‘Z’ to let him have on
credit goods for which he does not mean to pay. ‘A’ has committed:
(a) Cheating by personation
(b) Cheating
(c) Extortion
(d) None of the above.
Ans. (b)
96. Read the following:
(1) R. v. Mcnaughten is the case related with insanity as a
defence.
(2) R. v. Govinda is the case related with common intention.
Of the above:
(a) (1) is true but (2) is false
(b) (1) is false but (2) is true
(c) Both (1) and (2) are true
(d) Both (1) and (2) are false.
Ans. (a)
97. “A” under the influence of unsoundness attempt to kill “B”.
“B” in attempting to defend himself caused grievous hurt to “A”. Here:
(a) “A” is liable for attempt to murder and “B” is liable for
causing hurt
(b) “A” commits no offence and “B” is liable for grievous hurt
(c) “B” commits no offence and “A” is liable for attempt to murder
(d) Both “A” and “B” are excused from liability.
Ans. (d)
98. In which of the following Sections of I.P.C. ‘preparation’ is
punishable:
(a) Sections 121, 125, 398
(b) Sections 122, 125, 399
(c) Sections 122, 126, 399
(d) Sections 121, 126, 398.
Ans. (c)
99. Which of the following is not “sine qua non” for making a
person criminally liable:
(a) Actus reus
(b) Mens rea
(c) Motive
(d) All the above.
Ans. (c)
100. To which of the following offences the Apex Court judgment in
Abhayanand Mishra v. State of Bihar is related to:
(a) Sections 420 and 511 of I.P.C.
(b) Section 511 of I.P.C. only
(c) Section 420 of I.P.C. only
(d) None of the above
Ans. (a)
101. What should be the age of minor to constitute the offence of
kidnapping:
(a) 16 years
(b) 18 years
(c) below 16 years in case of male and below 18 years in case of
female
(d) Below 18 years in case of male and below 21 years in case of
female.
Ans. (c)
102. ‘A’ having joint property with Z in a horse, intending
thereby to cause wrongful loss to Z, shoots the horse. Under what section of
I.P.C. ‘A’ shall be charged with:
(a) Section 426
(b) Section 429
(c) Section 437
(d) Section 438.
Ans. (b)
103. ‘A’ has consensual sexual relations with ‘Z’s wife. She gives
to ‘A’ a valuable property which ‘A’ knows to belong to her husband ‘Z’ and she
has no authority from ‘Z’ to give. ‘A’ takes the property dishonestly. Which
one of the following offences has been committed by ‘A’:
(a) Criminal breach of trust
(b) Theft and criminal breach of trust
(c) Theft
(d) Criminal misappropriation.
Ans. (c)
104. Adultery is an offence committed:
(a) with the consent of a married woman
(b) with the consent of a woman
(c) without the consent of a woman but with the consent of her
husband
(d) with the consent of a minor girl.
Ans. (a)
105. The expression “unsoundness of mind”:
(a) is not defined in I.P.C.
(b) is defined in I.P.C.
(c) is not treated as equivalent to insanity
(d) is not general exception in I.P.C.
Ans. (a)
106. State of A.P. v. R. Punnayya case deals with distinction
between which of following sections of Indian Penal Code:
(a) Sections 501 and 502
(b) Sections 299 and 300
(c) Sections 304A and 304B
(d) Sections 305 and 306.
Ans. (b)
107. Which sections of Indian Penal Code provides for the offences
relating to the Army, Navy and Air Force:
(a) Sections 171A to 171-1
(b) Sections 124 to 129
(c) Sections 131 to 140
(d) Sections 165 to 171.
Ans. (c)
108. In which case the court made a clear distinction between
‘common intention’ and ‘similar intention’:
(a) Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor
(b) Mahboob Shah v. King Emperor
(c) Kripal Singh v. State of U.P.
(d) Rishi Deo Pandey v. State of U.P.
Ans. (b)
109. Which is not the ‘stolen property’:
(a) Possession whereof was obtained by cheating
(b) Possession whereof was obtained by robbery
(c) Possession whereof was obtained by extortion
(d) Possession whereof was obtained by criminal breach of trust.
Ans. (a)
110. In which of the following cases, the offence of
‘house-breaking’ is committed:
(a) A commits house-trespass by entering Z’s house through the
door, having lifted a latch by putting a wire through a hole in the door
(b) A finds the key of Z’s house-door, which Z had lost, and
commits house-trespass, by entering Z’s house through that key
(c) Z, the doorkeeper of Y, is standing in Y’s doorway. A
commits house-trespass by entering the house, having deterred Z from opposing
him by threatening to beat him
(d) All these.
Ans. (d)
111. Consider the following statement and select the correct
answer:
A. All the recommendations of the Justice Verma Committee are
incorporated in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
B. Some of the recommendations of the Justice Verma Committee are
incorporated in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
C. Most of the recommendations of Justice Verma Committee are
incorporated in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
D. None of the above.
Ans. D
112. Which of the following sections have been inserted in the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, namely:
A. Section 376A
B. Section 376B
C. Sections 166A, 166B, 354C
D. All of the above.
Ans. D
113. According to Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, the right of
private defence of the body extends to the voluntary causing of death or of any
other harm to the assistant if the offence which occasions the exercise of the
right is the act of:
A. Stalking
B. Voyeurism
C. Acid Attack
D. All of the above.
Ans. C
114. Voluntarily throwing or attempting to throw acid is an
offence punishable under Indian Penal Code, 1860, under:
A. Section 326A
B. Section 326B
C. Section 228A
D. Section 228.
Ans. B
115. A demand or request for sexual favour from a woman is
punishable offence under Indian Penal Code, 1860, under:
A. Section 354A
B. Section 354B
C. Section 354C
D. Section 354D.
Ans. A
116. A man shall be guilty of the offence of sexual harassment
under section 354A of Indian Penal Code, 1860, if he commits:
(i) Physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit
sexual overtures.
(ii) A demand or request for sexual favours.
(iii) Showing pornography against the will of a woman.
(iv) Making sexually coloured remarks.
A. (i) and (ii)
B. (i) and (iii)
C. (i), (ii) and (iii)
D. (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv).
Ans. D
117. A man is said to commit “rape” if he penetrates his penis, to
any extent, into the ________ of a woman:
A. Vagina
B. Mouth
C. Urethra or Anus
D. All of the above.
Ans. D
118. When a man inserts, to any extent, any object or a part of
the body, not being the penis, into the vagina, the urethra or anus of a woman
or makes her to do so with him or any other person, he commits:
A. Rape
B. Sexual Harassment
C. Sexual Assault
D. None of the above.
Ans. A
119. To establish section 34 of IPC:
A. common intention be proved but not overt act be proved
B. common intention and overt act both be proved
C. common intention need not be proved but overt act be proved
D. all the above.
Ans. A
120. Section 34 of IPC:
A. creates a substantive offence
B. is a rule of evidence
C. both (a) and (b)
D. neither (a) nor (b).
Ans. B
121. ‘X’ & ‘Y’ go to murder ‘Z’. ‘X’ stood on guard with a
spear in hand but did not hit ‘Z’ at all. Y killed ‘Z’:
A. only ‘Y’ is liable for murder of Z
B. ‘X’ & ‘Y’ both are liable for murder of ‘Z’
C. ‘X’ is not liable as he did not perform any overt act
D. both (a) & (c).
Ans. B
122. ‘Voluntarily’ has been defined as an effect caused by means
whereby a person intended to cause it or by means, at the time of employing
those means, know or had reason to believe to be likely to cause it under:
A. section 39
B. section 38
C. section 37
D. section 40.
Ans. A
123. Under section 45 of IPC, life denotes:
A. life of a human being
B. life of an animal
C. life of human being and of an animal both
D. life of either human being or animal.
Ans. A
124. Under section 46 of IPC, death denotes:
A. death of a human being
B. death of an animal
C. death of a human being and of an animal both
D. death of either human being or an animal.
Ans. A
125. Illegal signifies:
A. everything which is an offence
B. everything which is prohibited by law
C. everything which furnishes ground for civil action
D. all the above.
Ans. D
126. Animal denotes:
A. any living creature including human being
B. any living creature other than a human being
C. any creature – live or dead
D. either (a) or (c).
Ans. B
127. How many types of punishments have been prescribed under the
Indian Penal Code:
A. three
B. six
C. five
D. four.
Ans. C
128. Under section 60 of IPC, in certain cases of imprisonment,
the sentence of imprisonment:
A. has to be wholly rigorous
B. has to be wholly simple
C. can be partly rigorous and partly simple
D. either (a) or (b).
Ans. C
129. Sentence of imprisonment for non-payment of fine under
section 64 of IPC:
A. shall be in excess of any other imprisonment to which an
offender has been sentenced
B. shall be concurrent of any other imprisonment
C. shall not be in excess of any other imprisonment
D. both (b) & (c).
Ans. A
130. Under section 65 of IPC sentence of imprisonment for
non-payment of fine shall be limited to:
A. one-third of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the
offence
B. one-fourth of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the
offence
C. one-half of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the
offence
D. equal to the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the
offence.
Ans. B
131. In case of an offence punishable with fine only, imprisonment
for non-payment of fine:
A. has to be rigorous
B. has to be simple
C. can be rigorous or simple
D. can be partly rigorous and partly simple.
Ans. B
132. Under section 498A of IPC cruelty includes:
A. harassment of the woman
B. physical cruelty only
C. mental cruelty only
D. cruelty by wife.
Ans. A
133. In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender
who is sentenced to pay a fine of not exceeding Rs. 100 but exceeding Rs. 50,
the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed:
A. two months
B. three months
C. four months
D. six months.
Ans. C
134. In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender
who is sentenced to pay a fine exceeding Rs. 100, the imprisonment in default
of payment of fine shall not exceed:
A. one year
B. six months
C. four months
D. two months.
Ans. B
135. Section 64 of IPC provides for:
A. nature & maximum limit of imprisonment for non-payment of
fine
B. nature & minimum limit of imprisonment for non-payment of
fine
C. nature but does not prescribe any limit of imprisonment for
non-payment of fine
D. limit of imprisonment for non-payment of fine but does not
prescribe the nature of imprisonment.
Ans. C
136. Imprisonment for non-payment of fine shall terminate:
A. on payment of fine
B. on expiry of the term of imprisonment for non-payment
C. both (a) & (b)
D. neither (a) nor (b).
Ans. C
137. In case of imprisonment for non-payment of fine, if a part of
the fine is paid, such sentence:
A. shall be reduced proportionately
B. shall not be reduced in direct proportion to the fine paid
C. shall be reduced but subject to the discretion of the court as
to the quantum of reduction
D. all of the above.
Ans. A
138. Section 73 of IPC provides for the maximum limit of solitary
confinement to be:
A. one year
B. two years
C. three months
D. six months.
Ans. C
139. If an offender has been sentenced to imprisonment not
exceeding six months, the solitary confinement:
A. shall not exceed 15 days
B. shall not exceed one month
C. shall not exceed two months
D. shall not exceed forty-five days.
Ans. B
140. If an offender is sentenced to imprisonment for a term
exceeding six months but not exceeding one year, the term of solitary
confinement:
A. shall not exceed one month
B. shall not exceed forty-five days
C. shall not exceed two months
D. shall not exceed three months.
Ans. C
141. If an offender is sentenced to imprisonment for a term
exceeding one year, the term of solitary confinement shall not exceed:
A. one month
B. two months
C. three months
D. six months.
Ans. C
142. Nothing is said to be done or believed to be done in
goodfaith which is done or believed without due care & intention – is the
definition of goodfaith contained in:
A. section 29 of IPC
B. section 29A of IPC
C. section 52 of IPC
D. section 52A of IPC.
Ans. C
143. General exceptions are contained in:
A. chapter III of IPC
B. chapter IV of IPC
C. chapter V of IPC
D. chapter VI of IPC.
Ans. B
144. Section 76 provides that nothing is an offence which is done
by a person who is or who by reason of:
A. mistake of fact in good faith believes himself to be bound by
law to do it
B. mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be bound by
law to do it
C. mistake of fact believes himself to be bound by morals to do it
D. all the above.
Ans. A
145. Under section 79, nothing is an offence which is done by a
person who is justified by law or who by reason of mistake of fact in goodfaith
believes himself to be:
A. bound by law to do it
B. justified by law to do it
C. bound by morality to do it
D. all the above.
Ans. B
146. The maximum ‘ignorantia juris non excusat’ means:
A. ignorance of law is no excuse
B. ignorance of fact is no excuse
C. ignorance of law is an excuse
D. ignorance of fact is an excuse.
Ans. A
147. Section 76 & section 79 of IPC provide the general
exception of:
A. mistake of law
B. mistake of fact
C. both mistake of law and fact
D. either mistake of law or of fact.
Ans. B
148. Accident as an exception has been dealt with in:
A. section 77
B. section 78
C. section 80
D. section 82.
Ans. C
149. Under section 80, the exception of accident is available when
an offence is committed while:
A. doing a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means
B. doing a lawful act in any manner by any means
C. doing a lawful act in a lawful manner by any means
D. all the above.
Ans. A
150. The principle as to the way in which a man should behave when
he has to make a choice between two evils is illustrated in:
A. section 80 of IPC
B. section 81 of IPC
C. section 82 of IPC
D. section 78 of IPC.
Ans. B
151. Who was the President of the drafting committee of the Indian
Penal Code?
A. Lord William Bentinck
B. Lord Curzon
C. Lord Macaulay
D. Lord Irwin
Ans. C
152. Assault or use of criminal force on a woman with intent to
outrage her modesty is dealt under-
A. Section 354 of IPC
B. Section 355 of IPC
C. Section 356 of IPC
D. Section 357 of IPC
Ans. A
153. Under which name the Indian Penal Code came into application
in Jammu and Kashmir?
A. Indian Legislative Act
B. Ranbir Penal Code
C. Indian Penal Act
D. Mahomedan Act
Ans. B
154. Assault or use of criminal force in an attempt to wrongfully
confine a person is dealt under-
A. Section 357 of IPC
B. Section 358 of IPC
C. Section 359 of IPC
D. Section 360 of IPC
Ans. A
155. Which of the following is the principle applied in construing
a penal Act?
A. If, in any construing the relevant provisions, “there appears
any doubt of ambiguity,” it will be resolved against the person who would be
liable to the penalty.
B. If, in any construing the relevant provisions, “there appears
any doubt of ambiguity,” it will be resolved in the favour of the person who
would be liable to the penalty.
C. If, in any construing the relevant provisions, “there appears
any doubt of ambiguity,” it will attract life imprisonment.
D. If, in any construing the relevant provisions, “there appears
any doubt of ambiguity,” it will attract capital punishment.
Ans. B
156. Which of the following matches is incorrect relative to the
use of the English law?
A. Sections 96 to 106 of the Code – can be interpreted on the
basis of principles governing self defence under the English law
B. Reliance on case decided under the English law – misleading
C. In defamation cases the court must with reference – Section 499
D. Indian Penal Code is based on – English Common Law in respect
to the major offences which are universally applicable
Ans. A
157. Putting or attempting to put a person in fear of death or
grievous hurt in order to commit extortion is dealt under-
A. Section 385 of IPC
B. Section 386 of IPC
C. Section 387 of IPC
D. Section 388 of IPC
Ans. C
158. actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea means?
A. a deed, a material result of human conduct
B. the intent and act must both concur to constitute the crime
C. putting to death
D. uncommended manner
Ans. B
159. X added potassium cyanide into Y’s drink intending to kill
him. However, Z also happened to sip from Y’s glass. They both died. The
medical report claimed that Y actually died of a cardiac arrest, as the
poisonous substance administered was insufficient to cause his death. In
addition, Z died due to the effect of the poison. So:
A. X is liable for the death of Y and not for the death of Z
B. X is not liable for the death neither of Y nor of Z
C. X is liable for the death of both Y and Z
D. X is liable for the death of Z only
Ans. B
160. Cheating and thereby dishonesty inducing delivery of
property, or the making alteration or destruction of a valuable security is
dealt under-
A. Section 417 of IPC
B. Section 418 of IPC
C. Section 419 of IPC
D. Section 420 of IPC
Ans. D
161. Literally, mens rea means:
A. guilty mind
B. a guilty or a wrongful purpose
C. a criminal intent, a guilty knowledge and wilfulness
D. All of the above
Ans. D
162. The appellant stabbed the deceased in the abdomen. The
deceased was taken promptly to hospital and the wound was stitched but few days
later he died. The evidence showed that at the time of death the wound had
healed. But due to terramycin injection being given in excess lungs had become
over logged and caused pneumonia on the question of causation:
A. The appellant can be acquitted
B. The appellant cannot be acquitted
C. The appellant and the doctor both cannot be acquitted
D. The doctor must be acquitted
Ans. A
163. Habitually dealing in stolen property is dealt under-
A. Section 411 of IPC
B. Section 412 of IPC
C. Section 413 of IPC
D. Section 414 of IPC
Ans. C
164. Cheating is dealt under-
A. Section 417 of IPC
B. Section 418 of IPC
C. Section 419 of IPC
D. Section 420 of IPC
Ans. A
165. Even though a man’s knowledge that a particular consequence
will probably result from his act is sometimes an insufficient basis for saying
that he intends it, there are strong reasons for holding that as a legal matter
he can be held to intend something that he knows for sure he is doing. This is
called:
A. skewed intent
B. oblique intent
C. hypothetical intent
D. square intent
Ans. B
166. In which of the following cases mens rea is not an essential
ingredient for offences under-
A. Revenues Acts
B. Public nuisance
C. Criminal case which are in summary mode
D. All of these
Ans. D
167. During house trespass or house-breaking in order to the
commission of an offence punishable with imprisonment and if the offence is
theft is dealt under-
A. Section 169 of IPC
B. Section 170 of IPC
C. Section 171 of IPC
D. Section 454 of IPC
Ans. D
168. Defamation against the President or the Governor of a State
or Administrator of a Union Territory or Minister in respect of his conduct in
the discharge of his public functions when instituted upon a complaint made by
the Public Prosecutor is dealt under-
A. Section 497 of IPC
B. Section 498 of IPC
C. Section 498A of IPC
D. Section 500 of IPC
Ans. D
169. A had an argument with B and asked her to go leave him alone
and go home. B refused and A struck her on the head and rendered her
unconscious. A dragged B to the parking lot during which B’s head hit the
pavement which caused her death.
A. A is not responsible for her death as that was not the intent
B. A is only responsible for assaulting her
C. A is responsible for B’s death as the death was caused due A’s
negligence
D. None of them
Ans. C
170. Presumption of culpable mental state of a person as per
Section 10-C of the IPC includes:
I. Intention
II. Motive
III. Knowledge of fact
IV. Belief in or reason to believe a fact
A. I and II only
B. I and III only
C. II, III and IV only
D. I, II, III and IV
Ans. D
171. Grievous hurt caused whilst committing lurking house trespass
or house breaking is dealt under-
A. Section 458 of IPC
B. Section 459 of IPC
C. Section 460 of IPC
D. Section 461 of IPC
Ans. B
172. Dishonesty breaking open or unfastening any closed receptacle
containing or supposed to contain property is dealt under-
A. Section 458 of IPC
B. Section 459 of IPC
C. Section 460 of IPC
D. Section 461 of IPC
Ans. D
173. A President of a Pharmaceutical Company for introducing into
interstate commerce drugs that were misbranded. The President pleaded lack of
knowledge of this fact?
A. The President must be convicted
B. The President must be acquitted
C. The President and the company must be convicted
D. none of them
Ans. A
174. False statement, rumour, etc, with intent to create enmity,
hatred or ill-will between different classes is dealt under-
A. Section 169 of IPC
B. Section 505 of IPC
C. Section 171 of IPC
D. Section 172 of IPC
Ans. B
175. X an employee of Y was driving the vehicle which was without
insurance. Y was convicted for violation of Road Traffic Act, 1988, who was not
even driving the vehicle at that time. Y appealed against it in the court.
A. the conviction should be upheld
B. the conviction must be set aside
C. both the X and Y must be convicted
D. only X must be convicted
Ans. B
176. The question whether a corporate body should or should not be
liable for criminal action resulting from the acts of some individuals must
depend on:
A. nature of the offense disclosed by the allegations in the
complaint or in the charge sheet
B. the relative position of the officer or agent vis-a-vis the
corporate body
C. other relevant facts and circumstances which could show the
corporate body as such meant or intended to commit that act
D. all of them
Ans. D
177. Automation in legal sense implies:
A. self-acting of performance or involuntary acts
B. without any knowledge of acting or action
C. with no consciousness of what is being done
D. all of them
Ans. D
178. Which of the following is false about the presumption of
innocence?
A. this holds good in all kinds of trials including criminal
trials
B. in this case the crime must be brought to a prisoner
C. it can be easily rebutted
D. graver the crime, greater will be the degree of doubt that is
reasonable
Ans. C
179. Which of the following is pointed out by the Supreme Court
regarding the rejection of the prosecution case on paltry ground?
A. The public are generally reluctant to come forward to depose
before the court hence it not correct to reject the prosecution version on the
ground that all witnesses to the occurrences have not been examined.
B. Invariably the witnesses add embroidery to the prosecution
story, perhaps for the fear of disbelief, which is not a ground to throw the
case overboard.
C. It is not proper to reject the case for want of corroboration
by the independent witnesses if the case made out is otherwise true or
acceptable.
D. All of them
Ans. D
180. Enticing or taking away or detaining with a criminal intent a
married woman is dealt under-
A. Section 497 of IPC
B. Section 498 of IPC
C. Section 498A of IPC
D. Section 500 of IPC
Ans. B
181. Which of the following is not true of the absence of
explanation from the accused?
A. it is not sufficient to rebut so strong a presumption as that
of innocence
B. it is capable of being taken into account to corroborate other
evidence
C. proof of guilt can be inferred from the mere absence of
explanation
D. it is not material
Ans. C
182. Forgery is dealt under-
A. Section 464 of IPC
B. Section 465 of IPC
C. Section 466 of IPC
D. Section 467 of IPC
Ans. B
183. Having possession of a document, knowing it to be forged,
with intent to use it as genuine; if the document is one of the description
mentioned in section 466 of the Indian Penal Code is dealt under-
A. Section 471 of IPC
B. Section 472 of IPC
C. Section 473 of IPC
D. Section 474 of IPC
Ans. D
184. In which of the following case the Supreme Court pointed out
this fact in relation to the above question?
A. State of Punjab v. Bhajan Singh (1975)
B. M.S. Sheriff v. State of Madras (1954)
C. Tika v. State of UP (1974)
D. None of them
Ans. B
185. Attempting to commit offences punishable with imprisonment
of life or imprisonment, and in such attempt doing any act towards the
commission of the offence is dealt under-
A. Section 510 of IPC
B. Section 511 of IPC
C. Section 512 of IPC
D. Section 513 of IPC
Ans. B
186. Which of the following is the facet of audi alteram partem?
A. notice of the case to be met
B. good faith
C. opportunity to explain
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans. D
187. In respect to cases instituted otherwise than on Police
report, under which section charges are framed?
A. Section 240 Cr. PC.
B. Section 246 Cr. PC.
C. Section 256 Cr. P.C.
D. None of them
Ans. B
188. False statement rumour, etc., made in place of worship etc,
with intent to create enmity hatred
or ill-will is dealt under-
A. Section 128 of IPC
B. Section 201 of IPC
C. Section 505 of IPC
D. Section 302 of IPC
Ans. C
189. Under which section of the IPC a person irrespective of his
nationality can be held guilty and is liable to punishment for any offence
within India?
A. Section 2 of IPC
B. Section 5 of IPC
C. Section 7 of IPC
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans. A
190. Mischief committed after preparation made for causing death,
or hurt, etc. is dealt under-
A. Section 438 of IPC
B. Section 439 of IPC
C. Section 440 of IPC
D. Section 441 of IPC
Ans. C
191. Being entrusted with any closed receptacle containing or
supposed to contain any property, and fraudulently opening the same is dealt
under-
A. Section 462 of IPC
B. Section 463 of IPC
C. Section 464 of IPC
D. Section 465 of IPC
Ans. A
192. Under which of the following a corporation is indictable?
A. Vicarious liability
B. Personal liability for breach of statutory duty
C. Personal liability on the basis of attributing to the
corporation the conduct and state of mind of an individual
D. All of them
Ans. D
193. X participated in the child marriage of Y in another country.
Both X and Y were still Indian citizens at the time the marriage took place.
A. Y is liable for punishment under Section 3
B. Y is not liable as the marriage took place on a foreign soil
C. Both X and Y are liable for punishment under Section 3
D. None of them
Ans. C
194. Running vessel ashore with intent to commit theft, etc. dealt
under-
A. Section 438 of IPC
B. Section 439 of IPC
C. Section 440 of IPC
D. Section 441 of IPC
Ans. B
195. Which of the following section makes all the offences under
the Code without exception to be extra territorial?
A. Section 2
B. Section 4
C. Section 5
D. Section 7
Ans. B
196. Kidnapping or abducting a woman to compel her marriage or to
cause her defilement etc. is dealt under-
A. Section 365 of IPC
B. Section 366 of IPC
C. Section 367 of IPC
D. Section 368 of IPC
Ans. B
197. Extradition is:
A. to surrender of one State to another of a person desired to be
dealt with crimes of which he has been accused or convicted and which are
justifiable in the Courts of the other countries
B. a political act done in pursuance of a treaty or an arrangement
ad hoc
C. it can be sought on either in terms of treaty or on reciprocal
arrangement
D. all of them
Ans. D
198. Knowingly selling goods marked with counterfeit property mark
is dealt under-
A. Section 485 of IPC
B. Section 486 of IPC
C. Section 487 of IPC
D. Section 488 of IPC
Ans. B
199. Over which of the following admiralty jurisdiction extends?
A. Offences committed on Indian ships on the seas
B. Offences committed on foreign ships in Indian territorial
waters
C. Piracy
D. All of them
Ans. D
200. Which of the following is true about special law?
A. relates to a particular subject
B. applies only to a particular part of the country
C. excise, opium and cattle trespass act
D. both (A) and (C)
Ans. D
201. On refusal to disclose the name and address of the printer is
dealt under-
A. Section 489 D of IPC
B. Section 489 E of IPC
C. Section 490 of IPC
D. Section 491 of IPC
Ans. C
202. Which of the following section of the IPC does not affect the
provisions of any Act for punishing mutiny and desertion of officers, soldiers,
sailors or airmen in the service of the Government of India or the provisions
of any special or local law?
A. Section 3 of IPC
B. Section 4 of IPC
C. Section 5 of IPC
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans. C
203. The law of contempt is exercised in case of:
A. contempt committed in facie curiae
B. contempt committed in generalia specialibus non derogrant
C. contempt committed in ultra vires
D. contempt committed in ad hoc
Ans. A
204. Robbery is dealt under-
A. Section 391 of IPC
B. Section 392 of IPC
C. Section 393 of IPC
D. Section 394 of IPC
Ans. B
205. False statement in connection with elections is dealt under-
A. Section 170 G of IPC
B. Section 171 G of IPC
C. Section 172 G of IPC
D. Section 173 G of IPC
Ans. B
206. Promoting enmity between classes in place of worship, etc. is
dealt under-
A. Section 153A of IPC
B. Section 154A of IPC
C. Section 155A of IPC
D. Section 156A of IPC
Ans. A
207. A, surgeon, in good faith communicates to a patient his
opinion that he cannot live. The patient dies in consequence of the shock.
A. A is guilty as he should have withheld the communication
B. A is not guilty as he rightly discharged his duties
C. A is not guilty as he did not give any false hopes
D. Both (B) and (C)
Ans. D
208. The defendant was set to watch his master’s premises. He saw
a man on the garden wall and hailed him and then shot at him aiming at his
legs. He missed and shot the deceased whom he had not seen.
A. the defendant is justified in shooting the deceased
B. the defendant is guilty of manslaughter
C. the defendant is not guilty as his own life was danger
D. none of them
Ans. B
209. The motive under section 81 of IPC should be:
A. prevention of harm to person
B. prevention of harm to property
C. both (a) and (b)
D. either (a) or (b).
Ans. D
210. ‘Infancy’ as an exception has been provided under:
A. section 80
B. section 81
C. section 82
D. section 84.
Ans. C
211. Section 82 of IPC provides that nothing is an offence which
is done by a child under:
A. six years of age
B. seven years of age
C. nine years of age
D. ten years of age.
Ans. B
212. Section 82 of IPC enunciates:
A. a presumption of fact
B. a rebuttable presumption of law
C. a conclusive or irrebuttable presumption of law
D. none of the above.
Ans. C
213. A person is stated to be partially incapax under section 83,
IPC if he is aged:
A. above seven years and under twelve years
B. above seven years and under ten years
C. above seven years and under sixteen years
D. above seven years and under eighteen years.
Ans. A
214. Section 83 of IPC lays down:
A. a presumption of fact
B. an inconclusive or rebuttable presumption of law
C. conclusive or irrebuttable presumption of law
D. irrebuttable presumption of fact.
Ans. B
215. Section 82 of IPC lays down the rule of:
A. wholly incapax
B. partially incapax
C. both (a) & (b)
D. either (a) or (b).
Ans. A
216. Under section 82 & section 83 of IPC an offence is
punishable if it is done by a child:
A. of below seven years of age
B. of above seven years of age but below twelve years if he has
not attained sufficient maturity and understanding
C. of above seven years of age but below twelve years having
attained sufficient maturity and understanding
D. all the above.
Ans. C
217. Which of the following pair is not correctly matched:
A. Mens Rea – R. v. Prince
B. Necessity – D.P.P. v. Beard
C. Insanity – Mc’Naughten case
D. Intoxication – Basudeo v. State of Pepsu.
Ans. C
218. The maxim ‘actus non facit rea nisi mens sit rea’ means:
A. crime has to be coupled with guilty mind
B. there can be no crime without a guilty mind
C. crime is the result of guilty mind
D. criminal mind leads to crime.
Ans. B
219. “In every statute, mens rea is to be implied unless the
contrary is shown.”:
This view was expressed in-
A. Sherras v. De Rutzen
B. R. v. Dudley & Stephen
C. Harding v. Price
D. R. v. Prince.
Ans. A
220. Which of the
following is correct for the aforesaid:
I. The physical aspect of crime is actus reas.
II. The mental aspect of crime is mens rea.
III. The motive is the desire to commit crime
A. I & II are correct but III is not correct
B. only II & III
C. only II & III
D. all the above.
Ans. D
211. Section 84 of IPC provides for:
A. medical insanity
B. legal insanity
C. moral insanity
D. unsoundness of mind of any kind.
Ans. B
212. Irresistible impulse is a defence:
A. in India
B. in England
C. in India and England both
D. neither in India nor in England.
Ans. D
213. A hangman who hangs the prisoners pursuant to the order of
the court is exempt from criminal liability by virtue of:
A. section 77 of IPC
B. section 78 of IPC
C. section 79 of IPC
D. section 76 of IPC.
Ans. B
214. Insanity as a defence means that a person at the time of
doing an act, by reason of unsoundness of mind is incapable of knowing:
A. the nature of the act
B. that what he is doing is wrong
C. that what he is doing is contrary to law
D. either (a) or (b) or (c).
Ans. D
215. Which of the following is correct:
A. the burden of proof that the accused was not insane at the time
of commission of offence is on the prosecution
B. the burden of proving that the accused was insane at the time
of commission of offence is on the accused
C. there is a rebuttable presumption of fact that accused was
insane at the time of commission of the offence
D. it is a matter of inference to be drawn by the court on the
facts proved by the prosecution.
Ans. B
216. For unsoundness of mind, the impairment of the cognitive
faculty of mind to escape criminal liability:
A. must be total
B. must be partial
C. both (a) & (b)
D. none of the above.
Ans. A
217. Intoxication as defence is contained in:
A. section 85 of IPC
B. section 86 of IPC
C. section 87 of IPC
D. both (a) & (b).
Ans. D
218. For a defence of intoxication, to escape criminal liability,
the degeneration of mental faculties:
A. must be total
B. must be partial
C. both (a) & (b)
D. only (b) above is correct & (a) is incorrect.
Ans. A
219. For a defence of intoxication, to escape criminal liability,
the intoxication:
A. can be self-administered
B. administered against his will or knowledge
C. should not be self-administered
D. all the above.
Ans. B
220. In cases where the act involves a specific mens rea, in cases
of intoxication under section 86 of IPC:
A. the existence of mens rea is presumed
B. the specific mens rea is not presumed
C. the specific mens rea depends upon the attending circumstances
& the degree of intoxication
D. none of the above.
Ans. C
221. The doctrine ‘volenti nonfit injuria’ is contained in:
A. section 87 of IPC
B. section 88 of IPC
C. section 89 of IPC
D. all the above.
Ans. D
222. The defence of ‘consent’ applies to:
A. private wrongs
B. public wrongs
C. both (a) & (b)
D. neither (a) nor (b).
Ans. A
223. The defence of ‘consent’ is restrictive in its applicability
in cases involving:
A. alienable rights
B. inalienable rights
C. both (a) &(b)
D. neither (a) nor (b).
Ans. B
224. The defence of ‘consent’ is not available in cases of:
A. consent to cause death
B. consent to cause grievous hurt
C. both (a) & (b)
D. either (a) or (b).
Ans. C
225. Operation of consent to all offences, short of causing death
intentionally, has been extended under:
A. section 88 of IPC
B. section 90 of IPC
C. section 91 of IPC
D. section 87 of IPC.
Ans. A
226. Under section 89 the consent in respect of infants under 12
years of age or persons of unsound mind:
A. can be given by their guardians without any restriction
B. can be given by the guardian subject to restrictions mutually
agreed upon
C. can be given by the guardians subject to restrictions imposed
by law
D. all the above.
Ans. C
227. The consent is not a valid consent under section 90:
A. if given under a fear of injury or misconception of fact
B. if given by a person of unsound mind
C. if given by a child below 12 years of age
D. all the above.
Ans. D
228. Consent given under compulsion arising out of threat of
injury:
A. excuses the causing of death
B. excuses causing of any offence against the state punishable
with death
C. both (a) & (b)
D. neither (a) nor (b).
Ans. D
229. The maxim ‘de minimus non curat lex’ means:
A. law would not take action on small & trifling matter
B. law does not ignore any act which causes the slightest harm
C. law would not take action in serious matters
D. all the above.
Ans. A
230. The principle ‘de minimus non curat lex’ is contained in:
A. section 92 of IPC
B. section 93 of IPC
C. section 94 of IPC
D. section 95 of IPC.
Ans. D
231. The right of private defence is contained in:
A. section 94 of IPC
B. section 95 of IPC
C. section 96 of IPC
D. section 98 of IPC.
Ans. C
232. The right to private defence is based on the natural instinct
of:
A. self-preservation
B. self-respect
C. self-sufficiency
D. self-reliance.
Ans. A
233. The right to private defence is:
A. unrestricted
B. subject to restriction contained in section 99 of IPC
C. subject to restrictions contained in Chapter IV of IPC
D. subject to restrictions contained in any other provision of
IPC.
Ans. B
234. Right to private defence is:
A. available under all circumstances
B. available where there is time to have the recourse to the
protection of public authorities
C. available where there is no time to have recourse to the
protection of public authorities
D. all of the above.
Ans. C
235. The law on private defence in India:
A. is the same as in England
B. is narrower than the one in England
C. is wider than the one in England
D. none of the above.
Ans. C
236. The right to private defence is available with respect to:
A. harm to body
B. harm to movable property
C. harm to immovable property
D. all the above.
Ans. D
237. Under section 98 right to private defence also is available
against a:
A. person of unsound mind
B. person who does not have maturity of understanding
C. both (a) & (b)
D. neither (a) nor (b).
Ans. C
238. Every person has a right of private defence of his own body
and the body of any other person against any offence affecting the human body,
has been provided:
A. under section 96 of IPC
B. under section 97 of IPC
C. under section 98 of IPC
D. under section 99 of IPC.
Ans. B
239. Under Article 32 a writ petition can be made to the Supreme
Court by a person who himself has suffered only. Under which of the following,
a relative or friend of a person aggrieved can file a writ petition:
A. Habeas Corpus
B. Mandamus
C. Certiorari
D. all of the above.
Ans. A
240. The right guaranteed under Article 32 can be suspended:
A. by the Parliament
B. by the State Legislature
C. by the Supreme Court of India
D. when proclamation of emergency is in operation.
Ans. D
241. Petitions to the Supreme Court under Article 32 are subject
to the rule of Res judicata except:
A. Quo Warranto
B. Habeas Corpus
C. Certiorari
D. Prohibition.
Ans. B
242. The right given by Article 32:
A. cannot be abrogated by the Act of Legislature
B. cannot be abrogated unless the Constitution itself is amended
C. can be altered by the State Legislature
D. none of the above.
Ans. B
243. The Supreme Court has power under Article 32 to issue
directions or orders or writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus,
prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari:
A. only when there is a question of enforcement of a
fundamental right
B. when there is a question of internal disputes among communal
groups
C. when there is a question of election disputes
D. when there is a question of riotous situation.
Ans. A
244. Under which one of the following cases the traditional rule
of filing petition only by the person aggrieved except in the case of habeas corpus
is relaxed:
A. Trilokchand Moichand v. H.B. Munshi
B. Joginder Nath v. UOI
C. Rabindranath Bose v. UOI
D. Upendra Baxi v. State of UP.
Ans. D
245. Under Article 32:
A. time limit can be imposed on filing of petitions and so the
Indian Limitation Act applies
B. there is no lower and upper limit. The party aggrieved must
move the court at the earliest possible time and it is the discretion of the
court to decide whether it is reasonable delay or not.
C. time limit can be imposed by council of ministers
D. all of the above.
Ans. B
246. According to Article 30 ‘minorities’ have the right for the
administration of educational institutions:
A. which have been established by them only
B. which not necessarily have not been established by them but
belong to their religion or language
C. Article 30 does not speak about minority but deals with
Scheduled Tribes only
D. none of the above.
Ans. B
247. According to Articles 25 and 26, what constitutes an
essential part of religion or religious practice is to be decided by the court
on the basis of:
A. doctrines of particular religion
B. by referendum
C. by majority
D. by convening a religious meeting.
Ans. A
248. The fundamental rights as envisaged under Articles 12-35 are:
A. absolutely flexible
B. can be amended
C. not justiciable
D. cannot be amended at all.
Ans. B
249. Right of disabled employee as equal citizens not to be
defeated by their superiors and they have no right to defeat their lawful
rights:
A. Sunil Poddar v. Union Bank of India
B. Mani v. State of Tamil Nadu
C. Bhagwan Dass v. Punjab State Electricity Board
D. None of the above.
Ans. C
250. In the case of People’s Union for democratic Rights v. UOI:
A. non-payment of minimum wages is violative of Article 21
B. the decision in this case did not hearld for right to live with
basic human dignity
C. Article 21 does not envisage right to live with human dignity
D. none of the above.
Ans. A
251. The protection given to the accused under Article 20(3)
against compulsion ‘to be witness’ also includes ordinary documentary and
testimonial evidence:
A. the protection given under Article 20(3) is not attracted by
the above statement
B. the protection given under Article 20(3) is attracted by the
above statement
C. witness means other than an accused to whom protection is not
given
D. none of the above.
Ans. B
252. In case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Preventive
Detention Act, 1950 was found conflicting with the two Articles:
A. Articles 14 and 17
B. Articles 19 and 21
C. Articles 23 and 25
D. Articles 23 and 32.
Ans. B
253. Which section of Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was declared
ultra vires by the Supreme Court in case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras:
A. Article 17
B. Article 11
C. Article 14
D. Article 19.
Ans. C
254. In a Calcutta case, Manager of a Bank took security for
overdraft from the customer and caused the security to be entered into the
books of the banks. The Manager shortly afterwards returned the security to the
customer before satisfaction of the overdraft. The fact of return of security
was mentioned in the books of accounts.
A. The Manager acted dishonesty under Section 24
B. The customer acted of dishonesty under Section 24
C. both the Manager and the customer acted dishonestly under
Section 24
D. Neither of them is guilty
Ans. C
255. One Mrs. Komai bought a car on the name of her daughter,
Kiran, who is a minor, and got the insurance policy transferred on her name
(Mrs. Komal). The car met with an accident on two counts and she file for a
claim on both the counts, from the insurance agency. She acknowledged the
receipt of the money as Kiran. The insurance company her prosecuted under
Section 467 of the IPC alleging fraud on the appellant’s part?
A. Mrs. Komal is guilty of forgery because she made the insurance
company believed that she is Kiran
B. Mrs. Komal is not guilty of forgery because the said deceit did
not secure her any advantage as the entire transaction was that of Mrs. Komal
C. Mrs. Komal is guilty of forgery because she signed all the
papers in the name of Kiran
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans. B
256. Dishonest misappropriation of property, knowing that it was
in possession of a deceased person at his death and that it has not since been
in the possession of any person legally entitled to it is dealt under-
A. Section 402 of IPC
B. Section 403 of IPC
C. Section 404 of IPC
D. Section 405 of IPC
Ans. C
257. 148 Criminal breach of trust is dealt under-
A. Section 406 of IPC
B. Section 407 of IPC
C. Section 408 of IPC
D. Section 409 of IPC
Ans. A
258. Which of the following is false of Section 34 of the Indian
Penal Code?
A.it is only a rule of evidence
B. it does not create a distinct offence
C. lays down principle of liability
D. it is a penal provision
Ans. D
259. In a case P, a married lady was found in a pool of blood and
lying on the ground. On the way to hospital in ambulance she breathed her last.
It transpired in the evidence that when P was seated outside her jhuggi, her
brother came near her and challenged as to why she made a complaint against her
own brother R to the police, Her other brother R and Sharma too came. There was
an altercation wherein Sharma stabbed her to death. Which of the following is
true regarding this particular case?
A. As to the vicarious liability of R & C, that the accused
Sharma was not carrying an open knife in his hand and there was no evidence to
show that this fact was in the knowledge of the other accused.
B. Sharma had not given any call to his brothers that P should be
stabbed to death. Otherwise all the accused had not come together and for that
reason it is difficult to assume that all had a prior meeting of mind to cause
the death of their sister.
C. The words used by C were to teach P a lesson for making false
accusations. Keeping in view the close relationship, it is difficult to assume
that all of them had shared the common intention to kill P. Under these
circumstances, there is no reason to rope C and R by aid of Section 34, IPC and
they were acquitted.
D. All of them
Ans. D
260. Belonging to gang of persons associated for the purpose of
habitually committing dacoity is dealt under-
A. Section 398 of IPC
B. Section 399 of IPC
C. Section 400 of IPC
D. Section 401 of IPC
Ans. C
261. Buying or obtaining possession of a minor for the same
purposes is dealt under-
A. Section 371 of IPC
B. Section 372 of IPC
C. Section 373 of IPC
D. Section 374 of IPC
Ans. C
262. Which of the following does not attract Section 34 of the
IPC?
A. the accused husband killed his wife and threw her dead body
into the well to the knowledge of co- accused. As yet co-accused took the false
plea that on date and hour incident the deceased was present in the house.
B. the accused was involved in looting the victims in broad
daylight on the main public road. Main accused indulged in looting but
co-accused was simply standing nearby.
C. Driver and cleaner of a bus when form a common intention to
kill the deceased and in pursuance of the plan kill him and take away the sale
proceeds of the grain sold by him
D. all of them except the co-accused in B.
Ans. D
263. Habitual dealing in salves is dealt under-
A. Section 371 of IPC
B. Section 372 of IPC
C. Section 373 of IPC
D. Section 374 of IPC
Ans. A
264. Which of the following is false of Section 34 and Section 149
of the IPC?
A. S. 34 does not by itself create any specific offence whereas S.
149 does so
B. Some active participation in crime is required in S. 34 while
it is not needed in S. 149
C. S. 34 speaks of common intention while S. 149 contemplates
common object
D. S. 34 requires at least five persons who must share the common
intention while S. 149 requires at least two persons to share the common
intention
Ans. D
265. A attacks Z under such circumstances of grave provocation
that his killing of Z would be only culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
B, having ill-will towards Z, and intending to kill him and not having been
subject to the provocation, assists A in killing Z. Which of the following
judgment under Section 38 of IPC applies to A and B?
A. A is guilty of culpable homicide and B is guilty of murder
B. B is guilty of culpable homicide and A is guilty of murder
C. Both A and B are guilty of culpable homicide
D. Both A and B are guilty of murder
Ans. A
266. The basic principle which runs through Section 32 to 38 of
IPC is that:
A. in certain circumstances some part of the act is attributed to
a person who may have performed only a fractional part of it.
B. in certain circumstances an entire act is attributed to a
person who may have performed only a fractional part of it.
C. in certain circumstances an entire act is attributed to a
person who may have performed the whole of it.
D. in certain circumstances no act is attributed to a person who
may have performed only a fractional part of it.
Ans. B
267. Abetment of any offence, if the act abetted is committed in
consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment is dealt
under-
A. Section 109 of IPC
B. Section 110 of IPC
C. Section 111 of IPC
D. Section 112 of IPC
Ans. A
268. A quarrel arose between C on the one side and A and B on the
other. C abused A, whereupon A struck him with a stick, and B struck him down
with an axe on the head. He also received two other wounds with the axe on the
other parts of the body. Any one of the three axe wounds was sufficient enough
to cause death, especially the one on the head.
A. C is guilty for voluntarily provoking the attack while B is
guilty of culpable homicide
B. A is guilty of culpable homicide, while B is guilty of
voluntarily causing hurt
C. B is guilty of culpable homicide, while A is guilty of
voluntarily causing hurt
D. Both A and B are guilty of culpable homicide
Ans. C
269. All about ‘intention’ is true except one:
A. is a state of mind
B. is an objective element
C. rarely susceptible to proof
D. always a matter of inference
Ans. B
270. The word ‘illegal’ is applicable to everything:
A. which is an offence
B. which is prohibited by law
C. which furnishes ground for civil action
D. all of them
Ans. D
271. Several persons assemble at the door of the house of one K
and the appellant struck a blow with a kencha which fell on the left thigh of a
workman working in the house of one K whom the appellant and others wanted to
attack, and as the appellant struck at the very first person who opened the
door and that was how that came to receive the injury.
A. every person is guilty of vicarious liability excluding the
appellant
B. only the appellant is to be convicted for the said injury
C. none is guilty of vicarious liability
D. none of them
Ans. B
272. Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a
different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-
A. Section 109 of IPC
B. Section 110 of IPC
C. Section 111 of IPC
D. Section 112 of IPC
Ans. C
273. In a case the accused was convicted u/s. 325 I.P.C. and was
sentenced by trial Court to two months R.I. with fine of Rs. 500 for offence
under S. 325 I.P.C. The trial pended for seven long years.
A. the sentence is improper for an offence under Section 325 I.P.C
B. the sentence is proper and appropriate
C. the accused should be sentenced to fine and imprisonment till
the rising of Court
D. both (A) and (C)
Ans. D
274. A gives Z fifty strokes with a stick. Here A may have
committed the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to Z by the whole beating and
also by each of the blows which make up the whole beating. As per Section 71 of
IPC which of the following should be the punishment?
A. A is liable for every blow and should be imprisoned for fifty
years one for each blow
B. A is only liable for blows he delivered on the victim
C. A is liable to one punishment for the whole beating
D. A should be separately punished for beating and delivering
blows
Ans. C
275. Abetment of any offence, punishable with death or imprisonment
for life, if the offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment is
dealt under-
A. Section 115 of IPC
B. Section 116 of IPC
C. Section 117 of IPC
D. Section 118 of IPC
Ans. A
276. Abetting the commission of an offence by the public or by
more than ten persons is dealt under-
A. Section 117 of IPC
B. Section 118 of IPC
C. Section 119 of IPC
D. Section 120 of IPC
Ans. A
277. Concealing a design to commit an offence punishable with
imprisonment, if offence be committed if the offence be not committed is dealt
under-
A. Section 119 of IPC
B. Section 120 of IPC
C. Section 121 of IPC
D. Section 122 of IPC
Ans. B
278. In which of the following death sentence is awarded?
A. Waging war against the Government of India
B. Abetting mutiny actually committed
C. Murder
D. All of them
Ans. D
279. Which of the following is true about imprisonment?
A. it is characterised by hard labour
B. it is characterised by confinement to jail
C. is subject to the kind of imprisonment
D. all of them
Ans. D
280. Abetment of an offence, punishable with death or imprisonment
for life if an act, which causes harm to be done in consequence of the abetment
is dealt under-
A. Section 115 of IPC
B. Section 116 of IPC
C. Section 117 of IPC
D. Section 118 of IPC
Ans. A
281. Abetting the commission of an offence by the public or by
more than ten persons is dealt under-
A. Section 117 of IPC
B. Section 118 of IPC
C. Section 119 of IPC
D. Section 120 of IPC
Ans. A
282. What is the minimum term of imprisonment in case of, at the
time of attempting robbery or dacoity, the offender is armed with any deadly
weapon, he is punished with imprisonment of not less than:
A. four years under Section 397, IPC
B. five years under Section 397, IPC
C. six years under Section 397, IPC
D. seven years under Section 397, IPC
Ans. D
283. Which of the following Section of the IPC has not been
omitted?
A. Section 56
B. Section 57
C. Section 58
D. Section 59
Ans. B
284. Which of the following Section of the IPC has been repealed?
A. Section 60
B. Section 61
C. Section 62
D. Both (B) and (C)
Ans. D
285. Which of the following Section of the IPC deals with solitary
confinement?
A. Section 71
B. Section 72
C. Section 73
D. Section 74
Ans. C
286. Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a
criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable is dealt under-
A. Section 118B of IPC
B. Section 119B of IPC
C. Section 120B of IPC
D. Section 121B of IPC
Ans. C
287. Conspiring to commit certain offences against the State is
dealt under-
A. Section 120A of IPC
B. Section 121A of IPC
C. Section 122A of IPC
D. Section 123A of IPC
Ans. B
288. Concealing with intent to facilitate a design to wage war is
dealt under-
A. Section 120 of IPC
B. Section 121 of IPC
C. Section 122 of IPC
D. Section 123 of IPC
Ans. D
289. A is beating Z and Y jumps in to stop the beating. In the
process A intentionally strikes Y. As per Section 71 of IPC which of the
following should be the punishment?
A. A is liable to one punishment for voluntarily causing hurt to Z
and to another for the blow given to Y
B. A is liable to one punishment for voluntarily causing hurt only
to Z
C. A is liable to one punishment for voluntarily causing hurt only
to Y
D. None of them
Ans. A
290. In a case the accused who was a widower led a homely life
with his 12-year-old son, nephew and unmarried daughter. The accused suffered
from no insanity. One day the accused accompanied by his son went with an axe
in his hand to woods to gather siadi leaves. Sometimes after his nephew who had
been working in the field discovered the accused sleeping under a tree with the
blood stained axe beside him. There was no trace of the son of the accused.
Later his son was found hacked to death. It transpired in evidence that the
accused for the time being was seized of a state of mind in which he visualised
that a tiger was going to pounce on him and as such mistaking his son as the
tiger he cut him into pieces.
A. the accused is lying and is guilty of culpable homicide
B. it was mistake and the accused had no intention of causing the
death of his son whom he dearly loved.
C. the accused is not his sound frame of mind
D. none of them
Ans. B
291. A, the captain of a steam vessel, suddenly and without any
fault or negligence on his part, finds himself in such a position that before
he can stop his vessel, he must inevitably run down a boat B, with twenty to
thirty passengers on board, unless he changes the course of his vessel, and
that by changing his course, he must incur risk of running down a boat C with
only two passengers on board, which he may possibly clear. Here if A alters his
course without any intention to run down the boat C and in good faith for the
purpose of avoiding the danger to the passengers in boat B. But in the course
of this action A runs down boat C.
A. A is guilty
B. A is not guilty of any offence
C. A did not intentionally run down boat C
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans. B
292. A accused of murder, alleges that by reason of unsoundness of
mind, he did not know the nature of the act.
A. The burden of proof is on the police
B. The burden of proof is on A
C. The burden of proof is on the Court
D. None of them
Ans. B
293. The accused without any provocation caught hold of the legs
of a 7 year old child and dashed his head thrice in quick succession resulting
in the death of the boy. Immediately after the occurrence the accused ran away.
The accused pleaded insanity in defence.
A. the offence falls under Clause (iii) of Section 300, IPC
B. the offence falls under Clause (iv) of Section 300, IPC
C. the offence falls under Clause (v) of Section 300, IPC
D. the offence falls under Clause (vi) of Section 300, IPC
Ans. B
294. A, a surgeon, knowing that a particular operation is likely
to cause the death of Z, who suffers under painful complaint, but not
intending to cause Z’s death, and intending, in good faith, for Z’s benefit,
performs the operation with Z’s consent.
A. A is guilty of culpable homicide
B. A deliberately caused the Z’s death
C. A is not guilty of any offence
D. None of them
Ans. C
295. Assaulting or obstructing public servant when suppressing
riot, etc. is dealt under-
A. Section 150 of IPC
B. Section 151 of IPC
C. Section 152 of IPC
D. Section 153 of IPC
Ans. C
296. Knowingly carrying arms in any procession or organizing or
holding or taking part in any mass drill or mass training with arms is dealt
under-
A. Section 151AA of IPC
B. Section 152AA of IPC
C. Section 153AA of IPC
D. Section 154AA of IPC
Ans. C
297. Harbouring persons hired for an unlawful assembly is dealt
under-
A. Section 157 of IPC
B. Section 158 of IPC
C. Section 159 of IPC
D. Section 160 of IPC
Ans. A
298. ‘Sedition’ as offence was held constitutionally valid in
Kedar Nath v. State of Bihar, AIR 1962 SC 955 us dealt under-
A. Section 124 A of IPC
B. Section 128 of IPC
C. Section 136 of IPC
D. Section 138 of IPC
Ans. A
299. Public servant disobeying a direction of the law with intent
to cause is dealt under-
A. Section 164 of IPC
B. Section 165 of IPC
C. Section 166 of IPC
D. Section 167 of IPC
Ans. C
300. Public servant unlawfully engaging in trade is dealt under-
A. Section 166 of IPC
B. Section 167 of IPC
C. Section 168 of IPC
D. Section 169 of IPC
Ans. C
301. Personating public servant is dealt under-
A. Section 169 of IPC
B. Section 170 of IPC
C. Section 171 of IPC
D. Section 172 of IPC
Ans. B
302. Bribery is dealt under-
A. Section 167 E of IPC
B. Section 168 E of IPC
C. Section 169 E of IPC
D. Section 171 E of IPC
Ans. D
303. Personation at an election is dealt under-
A. Section 171 F of IPC
B. Section 172 F of IPC
C. Section 173 F of IPC
D. Section 174 F of IPC
Ans. A
304. Wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot, if
rioting be not committed is dealt under-
A. Section 151 of IPC
B. Section 152 of IPC
C. Section 153 of IPC
D. Section 154 of IPC
Ans. C
305. Z is thrown from his horse and is insensible. A, a surgeon,
finds out that Z requires to be trepanned. A, not intending Z’s death, but in
good faith for Z’s benefit, performs the trepan before Z recovers his power of
judging for himself.
A. A has committed offence
B. A has committed no offence
C. A has committed culpable homicide
D. both (A) and (C)
Ans. B
306. Mr. V, an appellant is an owner of a house in City A. The
wife of the first respondent Y, was tenant of a part of the first floor in that
house. On January 17, 1966, one R a servant of the appellant, called the wife
of the first respondent a thief and Halkat. On the following day, the first
respondent slapped R on his face which was followed by heated exchange of
abusive words and between the first respondent and the appellant’s husband.
The first respondent was annoyed and threw at the appellant’s
husband a file of papers. The file did not hit the appellant’s husband, but it
hit the elbow of the appellant causing a scratch. The appellant lodged
information to the police complaining that the first respondent had committed a
house trespass in order to the committing of an offence punishable with
imprisonment, had thrown a shoe at her and had slapped her servant R.
During the course of the investigation the appellant and R refused
to be examined at a public hospital, claiming that a private medical
practitioner had certified that the appellant had suffered from bleeding
incision.
As a judge of the case you would:
A. convict the accused under Section 95 of the IPC
B. acquit the accused under Section 95 of the IPC
C. fine the appellant under Section 95 of the IPC
D. Both (A) and the (C)
Ans. C
307. The accused shot dead his father who was abusing his mother
and was going to cut her throat. The accused:
A. acted with vindictive feelings
B. acted so due to the imminent danger to his mother’s life
C. is not guilty
D. (B) and (C)
Ans. D
308. Criminal intimidation by anonymous communication or having
taken precaution to conceal whence the threat comes is dealt under-
A. Section 506 of IPC
B. Section 507 of IPC
C. Section 508 of IPC
D. Section 509 of IPC
Ans. B
309. The people of the village S having assembled proceeded to cut
the bandh. People of the village K resisted but were turned back. Meanwhile a
large crowd collected on both sides, armed with lathis, spears and garases.
People of K seeing that the people of S were not likely to listen to their
remonstrance, proceeded in a body to prevent the cutting of the bandh to drive
them away. There was one man from village S who received fatal injuries and
died.
A. the action is well within the bounds of the right to private
defence of person and property
B. the conviction of the accused under Section 302 of the IPC,
cannot be sustained
C. neither (A) nor (B)
D. both (A) and (B)
Ans. D
310. Person for whose benefit or on whose behalf a riot takes
place not using all lawful means to prevent it is dealt under-
A. Section 155 of IPC
B. Section 156 of IPC
C. Section 157 of IPC
D. Section 158 of IPC
Ans. A
311. G’s party was engaged in the peaceful pursuit of worship at
their own takhat was busy attending to the Puja for the Nepali pilgrim. At that
point of time they were not members of an unlawful assembly. It was the party
of A who left their place and came to G’s takhat, presumably raising a dispute
over the offerings made by the Nepali pilgrim. They came armed with deadly
weapons and one of them inflicted a severe blow on the S and G’s side which
resulted in his death and others received as many as 27 serious injuries.
A. G’s party exercise the right to self defence
B. Both G and A’s party cannot claim the right to self defence
C. A’s party had full intention of causing harm
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans. D
312. Criminal intimidation by anonymous communication or having
taken precaution to conceal whence the threat comes is dealt under-
A. Section 506 of IPC
B. Section 507 of IPC
C. Section 508 of IPC
D. Section 509 of IPC
Ans. B
313. Which of the following is true of intent of defraud?
A. a general intention to defraud, without the intention of
causing wrongful gain to one person of wrongful loss to another
B. to prove intention of defraud, it is not at all necessary that
there should have been some persons defrauded, or who possibly might have been
defrauded by his act
C. the word defraud is of double meaning
D. all of them
Ans: D
314. The word ‘document’ as per Section 29 of IPC includes any
matter expressed or described upon by any substance:
A. by means of letters, figures or marks only
B. by more than one of those means intended to be used, or which
may used, as evidence of that matter
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. none of them
Ans: C
315. Which of the following can be called a ‘document’ as per
Section 29 of IPC?
A. banker’s cheque
B. power of attorney
C. map
D. all of them
Ans: D
316. Which of the following conditions are necessary to fulfil the
requirements of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code?
A. the person must be present on the scene of occurrence
B. there must a prior concert or a pre-arranged plan
C. either (A) or (B)
D. both (A) and (B)
Ans: D
317. Making preparation to commit dacoity is dealt under
A. Section 398 of IPC
B. Section 399 of IPC
C. Section 400 of IPC
D. Section 401 of IPC
Ans: B
318. The three accused armed with firearms and Accused 1 with
lathi came to the shot of the incident for the purpose of avenging the old
enmity. It was alleged that it was on the exhortation made by the Accused 1,
not to spare the deceased that the other accused started firing at the deceased.
It was held that when all the accused had reached the place of incident for the
purpose of avenging the old enmity nurtured by them should they wait for
Accused 1 to make exhortation to use the words “don’t allow him to flee and
don’t spare him this time.”. Which of the following judgment is the correct
judgment regarding the mentioned case?
A. apart from Accused 1 all others were convicted u/ss. 302/34
B. all of them were convicted u/ss. 302/34
C. Accused 1 was accordingly acquitted, as no common intention
could be attributed to him.
D. both (A) and (C)
Ans: D
319. Unlawful compulsory labour is dealt under
A. Section 371 of IPC
B. Section 372 of IPC
C. Section 373 of IPC
D. Section 374 of IPC
Ans: D
320. Which of the following conditions must be fulfilled for conviction
on circumstantial evidence?
A. the circumstances from which the conclusion is to be drawn
should be fully established and not “may be established”
B. the circumstances must be of a conclusive nature and tendency
C. it should exclude every possible hypothesis except the one to
be proved
D. all of them
Ans: D
321. Selling or letting to hire a minor for purposes of prostitution,
etc is dealt under
A. Section 371 of IPC
B. Section 372 of IPC
C. Section 373 of IPC
D. Section 374 of IPC
Ans: B
322. Which of the following creates a new offence?
A. Section 34 of the IPC
B. Section 35 and Section 36 of the IPC
C. Section 37 of the IPC
D. None of them
Ans: D
333. A, a jailor, has the charge of Z, a prisoner. A, intending to
cause Z’s death, illegally omits to supply Z with food; in consequence of which
Z is much reduced in strength, but the starvation is not sufficient to cause
his death. A is dismissed from his office, B succeeds him. B, without collution
with A, illegally omits to supply Z with food, knowing that he is likely
thereby to cause Z’s death. Z dies. Which of the following judgment applies to
both A and B under Section 37 of the IPC?
A. A is only guilty of an attempt to commit murder while B is
guilty of murder
B. A is guilty of murder while B is guilty of an attempt to murder
C. Both A and B are guilty of murder
D. Both A and B are guilty of attempt to murder
Ans: A
334. The act voluntarily done in effect and substance in Section
39, IPC means:
A. act done intentionally
B. act done with the knowledge of end result being crime
C. act done when the doer has a reason to believe that the actus
reus would be an offence
D. all of them
Ans: D
335. Abetment of any offence, if the person abetted does the act
with a different intention from that of the abettor is dealt under
A. Section 109 of IPC
B. Section 110 of IPC
C. Section 111 of IPC
D. Section 112 of IPC
Ans: B
336. The accused attacked the victim with a spear and the others
inflicted blows on legs and arms with lathies.
A. only those accused who used lathies are guilty
B. only the accused who used the spear is guilty
C. each accused must be convicted for the offence of which he is
actually found to be guilty
D. all the accused are guilty
Ans: C
337. Which of the following is the test to check whether an
offence involves moral turpitude?
A. check whether the act leading to a conviction is such as could
shock the moral conscience of the society in general
B. check whether the motive leading to the act was a base one
C. check whether on account of the act having been committed the
perpetrator is to be looked down in the society as a depraved man
D. all of them
Ans: D
338. The accused persons noticed someone stealing the crops grown
by the accused and beat the thief to death.
A. IPC Section 304 read with IPC Section 34 is applicable in this
case
B. IPC Section 304 Pt. II read with IPC Section 35 is application
in this case
C. IPC Section 38 is applicable in this case
D. IPC Section 308 is applicable in this case
Ans: C
339. A sets fire, by night, to an inhabited house in a large town,
for the purpose of facilitating a robbery and thus causes the death of person.
A. A did not intend to cause any death. It was an accident
B. A is guilty of robbery only
C. If A knew that he was likely to cause he would have done so
voluntarily to carry out the robbery
D. None of them
Ans: C
340. Abetment of any offence, when an effect is caused by the act
abetted different from that intended by the abettor is dealt under
A. Section 110 of IPC
B. Section 111 of IPC
C. Section 112 of IPC
D. Section 113 of IPC
Ans: D
341. A boy of 13 committed rape on a child 2 years. The accused
should be awarded
A. one year R.I. with fine of Rs. 2000
B. three year R.I with fine of Rs. 5000
C. only one year R.I.
D. only fine of Rs. 5000
Ans: A
342. Abetment of any offence, if abettor is present when offence
is committed dealt under
A. Section 114 of IPC
B. Section 115 of IPC
C. Section 116 of IPC
D. Section 117 of IPC
Ans: A
343. Concealing a design to commit an offence punishable with
death or imprisonment for life, if the offence be committed is dealt under
A. Section 117 of IPC
B. Section 118 of IPC
C. Section 119 of IPC
D. Section 120 of IPC
Ans: B
344. A public servant concealing a design to commit an offence
which it is his duty to prevent if the offence be committed dealt under
A. Section 117 of IPC
B. Section 118 of IPC
C. Section 119 of IPC
D. Section 120 of IPC
Ans: C
345. Which of the following punishment an offender is liable to
under the provision of Section 53, IPC
A. Death and imprisonment for life
B. Imprisonment and fine
C. Forfeiture of property
D. all of them
Ans: D
346. Which of the following punishment have been abolished?
A. Death penalty
B. Whipping
C. Detention in reformatories
D. Both (B) and (C)
Ans: D
347. A public servant concealing a design to commit an offence
which it is his duty to prevent if the offence be punishable with death or
imprisonment for life is dealt under
A. Section 118 of IPC
B. Section 119 of IPC
C. Section 120 of IPC
D. Section 121 of IPC
Ans: B
348. A public servant concealing a design to commit an offence
which it is his duty to prevent if the offence be not committed is dealt under
A. Section 116 of IPC
B. Section 117 of IPC
C. Section 118 of IPC
D. Section 119 of IPC
Ans: D
349. Abetment of an offence punishable with imprisonment, if the
abettor or the person abetted be a public servant, whose duty is to prevent the
offence is dealt under
A. Section 116 of IPC
B. Section 117 of IPC
C. Section 118 of IPC
D. Section 119 of IPC
Ans: A
350. Which of the following is false of Section 67 of the IPC?
A. the imprisonment so awarded shall be simple
B. fine not exceeding Rs. 50 – term not exceeding 4 months
C. fine exceeding Rs. 100 to any amount – term not exceeding 6
months
D. the term shall not in any case be in excess of the Magistrate’s
powers under S. 32 of Cr. PC
Ans: B
351. Criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable with
death, imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term of 2 years or
upwards is dealt under
A. Section 119B of IPC
B. Section 120B of IPC
C. Section 121B of IPC
D. Section 122B of IPC
Ans: B
352. Waging or attempting to wage war, or abetting the waging of
war, against the Government of India is dealt under
A. Section 121 of IPC
B. Section 122 of IPC
C. Section 123 of IPC
D. Section 124 of IPC
Ans: A
353. Collecting arms, etc, with the intention of waging war
against the Government of India is dealt under
A. Section 120 of IPC
B. Section 121 of IPC
C. Section 122 of IPC
D. Section 123 of IPC
Ans: C
354. Assaulting President Governor, etc, with intent to compel or
restrain the exercise of any lawful power is dealt under
A. Section 123 of IPC
B. Section 124 of IPC
C. Section 125 of IPC
D. Section 126 of IPC
Ans: B
355. A sees Z commit what appears to A to be a murder. A, in the
exercise to the best of his judgment exerted in good faith, of the power which
the law gives to all persons of apprehending murderers in the act, seizes Z, in
order to bring Z before the proper authorities.
A. A has committed an offence, while Z was acting in self-defence
B. Both A and Z committed an offence.
C. A has committed no offence, though it may turn out that Z was
acting in self-defence
D. None of them
Ans: C
356. A is at work with a hatchet; he head flies off and kills who
is standing by
A. A’s act is excusable
B. A’s act is unpardonable
C. A’s act is one of deliberate act
D. None of them
Ans: A
357. A, in a great fire pulls down houses in order to prevent the
conflagration from spreading. He does this with the intention in good faith of
saving human life or property.
A. A is not guilty
B. A is guilty
C. The action was intentional
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans: A
358. In a case the accused was alleged to kill four children at a
time. He raised the plea of insanity.
A. the plea is to be reject outright
B. the plea is to be considered only after the prosecution
succeeds in proving the case against the accused
C. the plea is must be considered putting aside the arguments of
the prosecution
D. None of them
Ans: B
359. A and Z agrees to fence each other for amusement. In the
course of fencing, without any foul play, A hurts Z.
A. A is guilty of offence
B. Both are guilty for indulging in a violent game
C. A is not guilty of any offence
D. None of them
Ans: C
360. A in good faith for his child’s benefit without the consent
of his child cut for the stone by a surgeon knowing it to be likely that the
operation will cause the child’s death, but not intending to cause the child’s
death.
A. A is guilty as he acted without the consent of his child
attracts punishment as per Section 89 of IPC
B. A is guilty as he knowingly caused the death of his child and
attracts punishment Section 89 of IPC
C. A is within the exception of Section 89 of IPC as inasmuch his
object was the cure of his child
D. None of them
Ans: C
361. Wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot, if
rioting be committed is dealt under
A. Section 152 of IPC
B. Section 153 of IPC
C. Section 154 of IPC
D. Section 155 of IPC
Ans: B
362. Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration is dealt under
A. Section 153B of IPC
B. Section 154B of IPC
C. Section 155B of IPC
D. Section 156B of IPC
Ans: A
363. Agent of owner or occupier for whose benefit a riot is
committed not using all lawful means to prevent it is dealt under
A. Section 154 of IPC
B. Section 155 of IPC
C. Section 156 of IPC
D. Section 157 of IPC
Ans: C
364. Being hired to take part in an unlawful assembly or riot is
dealt under
A. Section 156 of IPC
B. Section 157 of IPC
C. Section 158 of IPC
D. Section 159 of IPC
Ans: C
365. Committing affray is dealt under
A. Section 159 of IPC
B. Section 160 of IPC
C. Section 161 of IPC
D. Section 162 of IPC
Ans: B
366. Public servant framing an incorrect document with intent to
cause injury is dealt under
A. Section 166 of IPC
B. Section 167 of IPC
C. Section 168 of IPC
D. Section 169 of IPC
Ans: B
367. Public servant unlawfully buying or bidding for property is
dealt under
A. Section 169 of IPC
B. Section 170 of IPC
C. Section 171 of IPC
D. Section 172 of IPC
Ans: A
368. Wearing garb or carrying token used by public servant with
fraudulent intent is dealt under
A. Section 168 of IPC
B. Section 169 of IPC
C. Section 171 of IPC
D. Section 172 of IPC
Ans: C
369. Undue influence at an election is dealt under
A. Section 168 F of IPC
B. Section 169 F of IPC
C. Section 170 F of IPC
D. Section 171 F of IPC
Ans: D
370. Criminal intimidation and if threat be to cause death or
grievous hurt, etc is dealt under
A. Section 505 of IPC
B. Section 506 of IPC
C. Section 507 of IPC
D. Section 508 of IPC
Ans: B
371. A disabled man having only one hand was attacked by a strong
man by bamboos. The disabled man, a tea garden labourer fought for his life and
hit the aggressor by the pen-knife resulting in his death.
A. the man acted was well within the bounds of his right to self
defence
B. the man exceeded the bounds of the right to self defence
C. the man is guilty of manslaughter
D. both (B) and (C)
Ans: A
372. Owner or occupier of land not giving information of riot, etc
is dealt under
A. Section 152 of IPC
B. Section 153 of IPC
C. Section 154 of IPC
D. Section 155 of IPC
Ans: C
373. Two parties A and B gather together for free fight in order
to settle a land dispute and in the process end up inflicting injuries on one
another. Here:
A. the plea of private defence of property is valid
B. the plea of self defence is valid
C. the plea of private defence of any kind is invalid
D. none of them
Ans: C
374. In a certain case in revision by accused against conviction
and sentence under Section 279, IPC, the provisional Court on maintaining
conviction added a direction to RTO to cancel his license. It was held that it
is enhancement of sentence and no such enhancement is legal without notice to
accused.
A. Md. Shabir v. State of Maharashtra, 1978
B. Ranji Lai Modi v. State of U.P. Air 1957 Section 620
C. Mithu v. State of Punjab, AIR 1983 Section 473
D. Gian Kaur v. States of Punjab, Air 1996 Section 946
Ans: A
375. Insult intended to provoke breach of the peace is dealt under
A. Section 500 of IPC
B. Section 501 of IPC
C. Section 502 of IPC
D. Section 504 of IPC
Ans: D
376. ‘S’ is found in possession of property reasonably suspected
to be stolen by him and is arrested by ‘P’, a police officer. ‘S’ is excited to
sudden and violent passion by the arrest and fires at him but kills ‘D’ who was
standing near ‘P’, neither intending nor knowing himself to be likely to kill
‘D’. This is:
(a) culpable homicide not amounting to murder, because ‘S’ had
been deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation
(b) murder, because provocation was given by a thing done by a
public servant in lawful discharge of his powers
(c) culpable homicide not amounting to murder, because the death
of ‘D’ occurred by mistake or accident
(d) none of these.
Ans. (b)
377. Consider the following statements. To constitute abetment, it
is:
(a) necessary that the act abetted must be committed
(b) not necessary that the act abetted must be committed
(c) necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention
or knowledge as that of the abettor
Which of the statements given above represent(s) the correct
position of law?
(a) Only (b)
(b) Both (b) and (c)
(c) Only (a)
(d) Only (c).
Ans. (a)
388. Consider the following statements. To constitute abetment, it
is:
(a) every murder is culpable homicide
(b) every culpable homicide is murder
(c) every robbery is either theft or extortion
(d) every extortion is robbery
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) (a) and (c)
(b) (b) and (c)
(c) (a) and (d)
(d) (b) and (d).
Ans. (a)
389. With respect to the difference between kidnapping from lawful
guardianship and abduction which of the following statements is correct:
(a) Kidnapping is committed only in respect of a minor or a person
of unsound mind. Abduction is committed in respect of a person of any age.
(b) In former, the person kidnapped is removed out of lawful
guardianship. Abduction has reference exclusively to the person abducted.
(c) In kidnapping, consent of the person kidnapped or enticed is
immaterial. In abduction, consent of the person moved, if freely and
voluntarily given, condones abduction.
(d) All these.
Ans. (d)
390. ‘A’ and ‘Z’, both adults, agree to engage each other in
fencing for amusement. In course of such fencing, without any foul play, ‘A’
causes a superficial hurt to “Z”. Here, ‘A’:
(a) is guilty of causing hurt by sharp edged weapon as he attacked
‘Z’
(b) is not guilty as there is an implied consent on the part of
‘Z’ to suffer such harm
(c) is guilty because fencing is a dangerous sport
(d) both (1) and (3).
Ans. (b)
391. Which Section of the Indian Penal Code codifies, in the field
of criminal law, the maxim: ‘de minimis non curat lex’:
(a) Section 85, IPC
(b) Section 88, IPC
(c) Section 95, IPC
(d) Section 96, IPC.
Ans. (c)
392. The doctrine of Necessity has been elaborately considered in
the landmark decision of:
(a) R. v. McNaghten, (1843) 8 Eng Rep 718
(b) Basdev v. State of PEPSU, AIR 1956 SC 488
(c) R. v. Dudley and Stephens, (1884) 14 QBD 273
(d) Bimbadar Pradhan v. State of Orissa, AIR 1956 SC 469.
Ans. (c)
393. H takes property belonging to S out of the possession of S in
good faith, believing at the time when he takes it, that the property belongs
to himself. Later on realizing his mistake, H continues to appropriate the
property to his own use. H has committed the offence of:
(a) Robbery
(b) Criminal breach of trust
(c) Criminal Misappropriation
(d) Cheating.
Ans. (c)
394. Under Section 44 of I.P.C. the term ‘Injury’ means any harm:
(a) Illegally caused to a person in body and mind
(b) Illegally caused to a person in body and property
(c) Illegally caused to a person in body, mind, reputation or
property
(d) Illegally caused to a person in body, mind and reputation.
Ans. (c)
395. Under the Indian Penal Code, an act may be an offence under
the Code, but for the existence of a justification which may form a defence.
Which of the following is not such a defence:
(a) Act done by a child under seven years of age
(b) Act done by a person of unsound mind
(c) Act done by a child of immature understanding, above seven
years and under twelve in age
(d) Act done outside the territorial limits of India.
Ans. (d)
396. Consider the following statements:
(1) ‘A’ willfully by a misrepresentation misled a police officer
to arrest ‘B’ instead of ‘C’
(2) ‘A’ instigates ‘B’ to murder ‘C’, ‘B’ refuses to do so
(3) ‘A’ instigates ‘B’ to murder ‘D’, ‘B’ stabs ‘D’. ‘D’ survives
from wound
Which of the above constitute the offence of abetment?
(a) (1), (2) and (3)
(b) (1) and (3) only
(c) (2) and (3) only
(d) (1) and (2) only.
Ans. (a)
397. A and B both are of 16 years of age. A entices B for marriage
and takes her to another city. What offence has been committed by A:
(a) A has committed kidnapping
(b) A has committed no offence as B has gone with her own consent
(c) A has committed abduction
(d) A is himself minor. Hence A has commit no offence.
Ans. (a)
398. Assertion (A): The essence of joint liability under section
149 of the IPC is that the criminal act must have been done with a view to
fulfill the common object of an unlawful assembly. Reason (R): Any sudden and
provocative act done by a member of an unlawful assembly would render the other
members of that assembly liable:
(a) Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct
explanation of A
(b) Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct
explanation of A
(c) A is true but R is false
(d) A is false but R is true.
Ans. (c)
399. Assertion (A): In a criminal trial, the accused and the
defendant mean the same thing Reason (R): It depends which way you look, for
the prosecution a person is accused, for the person he is defendant against the
accusation:
(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of
A
(c) A is true, R is false
(d) A is false, R is true.
Ans. (a)
400. Assertion (A): X, because of unsound state of mind and not
knowing the nature of the act, attacks Y, who in self-defense and in order to
ward off the attack hits him thereby injuring him. Y has not committed an
offence. Reason (R): Y had a right of private defense against X under the
Indian Penal Code:
(a) Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct
explanation of A.
(b) Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct
explanation of A.
(c) A is true but R is false
(d) A is false but R is true
Ans. (a)
401. Assertion (A): X, because
of unsound state of mind and not knowing the nature of the act, attacks Y, who
in self-defence and in order to ward off the attack, hits him thereby injuring
him. Y has not committed an offence. Reason (R): Y had a right of private
defense against X under Section 98 of the Indian Penal Code:
(a) Both A and R are
individually true, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b) Both A and R are
individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c) A is true but R is false
(d) A is false but R is true.
Ans. (a)
402. The paddy lands of A and D
lie adjacent to each other. The prosecution case that when D was deepening the
channel on the boundary of his own land, the accused A pursuant to an
altercation hit D hard on head by a spade that proved fatal.
A. the fact that the body of D
lay on the land of A or the existence of any altercation between the two is not
sufficient to proof the exercise of the right of self defence by A
B. the complainant party is in
possession of the land and the accused party taking the law in hands attacks
the complainant, does not entitle the accused A to right of private defence
C. Neither (A) nor (B)
D. Both (A) and (B)
Ans: D
403. False statement, rumour,
etc, circulated with intent to cause mutiny or offence against the public peace
is dealt under
A. Section 505 of IPC
B. Section 300 of IPC
C. Section 299 of IPC
D. Section 351 of IPC
Ans: A
404. A enters by night which he
is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith mistaking A to be a burglar
attacks him.
A. Z has no offence as he acts
under misconception
B. Z is guilty
C. A has the same right of
private defence against Z under the same circumstance
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans: D
405. A person with fraudulent
intention going through the ceremony of being married knowing that he is not
thereby lawfully married is dealt under
A. Section 493 of IPC
B. Section 494 of IPC
C. Section 495 of IPC
D. Section 496 of IPC
Ans: D
406. A is attacked by a mob who
attempt to murder him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private
defence without firing on the mob, and he cannot fire without risk of harming
young children who are mingled with the crowd.
A. A must not use his right to
private defence
B. A will be guilty of
manslaughter if he fires on the mob
C. A will not be committing any
offence if he has to fire on the mob
D. None of them
Ans: C
407. Illegal payments in
connection with elections is dealt under
A. Section 169 H of IPC
B. Section 170 H of IPC
C. Section 171 H of IPC
D. Section 172 H of IPC
Ans: C
408. Absconding to avoid service
of summons or other proceeding from a public servant is dealt under
A. Section 172 of IPC
B. Section 173 of IPC
C. Section 174 of IPC
D. Section 175 of IPC
Ans: A
409. Not obeying a legal order
to attend at a certain place in person or by agent, or departing therefrom
without authority is dealt under
A. Section 174 of IPC
B. Section 175 of IPC
C. Section 176 of IPC
D. Section 177 of IPC
Ans: A
410. Intentionally omitting to
produce a document to a public servant by a person legally bound to produce or
deliver such document is dealt under
A. Section 175 of IPC
B. Section 176 of IPC
C. Section 177 of IPC
D. Section 178 of IPC
Ans: A
411. Intentionally omitting to
give notice or information to a public servant by a person legally bound to
give such notice or information is dealt under
A. Section 174 of IPC
B. Section 175 of IPC
C. Section 176 of IPC
D. Section 177 of IPC
Ans: C
412. Intentional omitting to
give notice or information to a public servant by a person legally bound to
give such notice or information if the notice or information is required by an
order passed under sub-section (1) of section 356 of this Code is dealt under
A. Section 176 of IPC
B. Section 177 of IPC
C. Section 178 of IPC
D. Section 179 of IPC
Ans: A
89. Knowingly furnishing false
information to a public servant, if the information required respects the
commission of an offence etc is dealt under
A. Section 169 of IPC
B. Section 170 of IPC
C. Section 177 of IPC
D. Section 172 of IPC
Ans: C
414. Being legally bound to
state truth and refusing to answer questions is dealt under
A. Section 179 of IPC
B. Section 180 of IPC
C. Section 181 of IPC
D. Section 182 of IPC
Ans: A
415. Knowingly stating to a
public servant on oath as true that which is false is dealt under
A. Section 179 of IPC
B. Section 180 of IPC
C. Section 181 of IPC
D. Section 182 of IPC
Ans: C
416. Resistance to the taking of
property by the lawful authority of a public servant is dealt under
A. Section 183 of IPC
B. Section 184 of IPC
C. Section 185 of IPC
D. Section 186 of IPC
Ans: A
417. Bidding by a person under a
legal in capacity to purchase it for property at a lawfully authorized sale or
bidding without intending to perform the obligation incurred thereby is dealt
under
A. Section 183 of IPC
B. Section 184 of IPC
C. Section 185 of IPC
D. Section 186 of IPC
Ans: C
418. Preventing the service or
the affixing of any summons of notice or the removal of it when it has been
affixed or preventing a proclamation is dealt under
A. Section 171 of IPC
B. Section 172 of IPC
C. Section 173 of IPC
D. Section 174 of IPC
Ans: C
419. Failure to appear at
specified place and specified time as required by a proclamation published
under sub-section (1) of section 82 of this Code is dealt under
A. Section 172-AofIPC
B. Section 173-AofIPC
C. Section 174-AofIPC
D. Section 175-A of IPC
Ans: C
420. Which of the following not
true of Section 75, IPC?
A. it provides for special
maximum sentence
B. it provides for a minimum
sentence
C. it is not incumbent in every
case of a previous conviction that such conviction should be taken into
account.
D. all of them
Ans: B
421. Which of the following may
be said to be non-compos mentis (not of sound mind)?
A. drunk
B. Made non compos by illness
C. lunatic or a madman
D. all of them
Ans: D
422. To invoke the defence of
insanity, which of the following must be clearly proved at the time of
committing the act?
I. the accused was labouring
under defect of reason
II. from disease of the mind
III. does not know the nature
and quality of the act he was doing
IV. if he did know, he did not
know what he was doing was wrong
A. I and IV
B. I and III
C. II, III and IV
D. I, II, III and IV
Ans: D
423. Assault or use of criminal
force otherwise than on grave provocation is dealt under
A. Section 349 of IPC
B. Section 350 of IPC
C. Section 351 of IPC
D. Section 352 of IPC
Ans: D
424. Insanity is a valid defence
on a charge of commission of an act prima facie criminal because of want of:
A. mens rea
B. actus reus
C. repondeat superior
D. none of them
Ans: A
425. Printing or enegrtacing
matter knowing it to be defamatory against the president or the Vice- President
or the Governor of a State or Administrator of a Union territory or a Minister
in respect of his conduct in the discharge of his public functions when
instituted upon a complaint made by the public prosecutor and Printing or
engraving matter knowing it to be defamatory in any other case is dealt under
A. Section 500 of IPC
B. Section 501 of IPC
C. Section 502 of IPC
D. Section 504 of IPC
Ans: B
426. Which of the following is
true of people suffering from delirium tremens?
A. they are dangerous to
themselves and others
B. they see various objects
lying around or crawling about
C. he cannot be criminally held
responsible for his acts
D. all of them
Ans: D
427. Attempt to commit robbery
or dacoity when armed with deadly weapons is dealt under
A. Section 398 of IPC
B. Section 399 of IPC
C. Section 400 of IPC
D. Section 401 of IPC
Ans: A
428. In which of the following
case voluntary drunkenness can be an excuse:
A. when the state of
intoxication is such that the accused is incapable of forming the specific
intent essential to constitute the crime
B. habitual drunkenness which
results in a diseased condition of the mind that the accused is incapable of
knowing the nature of the act or that he is doing is either wrong to contrary
to the law
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. Either (A) or (B)
Ans: C
429. In which of the following
way Section 88 differs from Section 87?
A. under it any harm except
death may be inflicted
B. the age of the person is not
mentioned
C. the age of the consenting
party must be at least twelve years
D. both (A) and (B)
Ans: D
430. Theft is dealt under
A. Section 376 of IPC
B. Section 377 of IPC
C. Section 378 of IPC
D. Section 379 of IPC
Ans: D
431. Which of the following is
not a true consent as described in Section 90, IPC?
I. by a person under the fear of
injury
II. by a person under a misconception
III. by a person of sound mind
IV.by a person who is
intoxicated
V. by a person who is under
twelve years of age
A. I, II
B. Ill
C. IV, V
D. I, II, IV, V
Ans: D
432. Harm in Section 94, IPC
means:
A. injurious mental reaction
B. infectious mental disease
C. injurious mental condition
D. all of them
Ans: A
433. Which of the following is
not pardonable under Section 94, IPC?
A. murder
B. offences against the state
punishable with death
C. robbery
D. Both (A) and (B)
Ans: D
444. Theft by clerk or servant
of property in possession of master or employer is dealt under
A. Section 380 of IPC
B. Section 381 of IPC
C. Section 382 of IPC
D. Section 383 of IPC
Ans: B
445. As per the Supreme Court
the right of private defence is:
A. defensive right circumscribed
by the statute
B. availed in the favour of the
aggressor
C. available only when the
circumstances clearly justifies it
D. Both (A) and (B)
Ans: D
446. On which of the general
principle the Supreme Court held that the right to private defence rests?
A. where a crime is endeavoured
to be committed by force, it is lawful to repeal that force in self defence
B. that a person could only
claim the right to use force after he had sustained a serious injury by an
aggressive wrongful assault
C. it is to protect the
aggressor
D. Both (A) and (B)
Ans: D
447. A, a public officer is
authorised by a warrant from a Court of Justice to apprehend Z. B, knowing that
fact and also that C is not Z, wilfully represents to A that C is Z, and they
intentionally causes A to apprehend C. Here:
A. A abets by instigation the
apprehension of C
B. B abets by instigation the
apprehension of C
C. B abets by instigation the
apprehension of A
D. C abets by instigation the
apprehension of Z
Ans: B
448. Kidnapping or obtaining the
custody of a minor in order that such minor may be employed or used for
purposes of begging is dealt under
A. Section 363A of IPC
B. Section 364A of IPC
C. Section 365A of IPC
D. Section 366A of IPC
Ans: A
449. Right of private defence is
not available:
A. to the aggressor
B. to the person who is attacked
C. to the aggressor against an
act done in private defence by the person attacked
D. only (a) & (c) are
correct.
Ans. D
450. In a case of free fight
between two parties:
A. right of private defence is
available to both the parties
B. right of private defence is
available to individuals against individual
C. no right of private defence
is available to either party
D. right to private defence is
available only to one party.
Ans. C
451. Under section 99, the right
of private defence is:
A. not available at all against
public servants engaged in the discharge of their lawful duties
B. available under all
circumstances against public servants engaged in the discharge of their lawful
duties
C. available against public
servants only when their acts cause reasonable apprehension of death or
grievous hurt
D. available against public
servants only when their acts cause reasonable apprehension of damage to
property.
Ans. C
552. Right to private defence
under section 99:
A. extends to causing more harm
than is necessary for the purpose of defence
B. does not extend to causing
more harm than is necessary for the purpose of defence
C. does not extend to causing
the harm necessary for the purpose of defence
D. restricts the harm caused to
be less than the one necessary for the purpose of defence.
Ans. B
453. Right of private defence
extends to causing death, under the circumstances laid down in:
A. sections 100 & 101 of IPC
B. sections 101 & 102 of IPC
C. sections 102 & 103 of IPC
D. sections 100 & 103 of
IPC.
Ans. D
454. Right of private defence of
the body extends to causing death has been dealt with under:
A. section 100 of IPC
B. section 101 of IPC
C. section 102 of IPC
D. section 103 of IPC.
Ans. A
455. Right of private defence of
property extending to causing death has been dealt with under:
A. section 103 of IPC
B. section 102 of IPC
C. section 101 of IPC
D. section 100 of IPC.
Ans. A
456. In cases of assault causing
reasonable apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, the right of private
defence extends voluntarily:
A. causing grievous hurt
B. causing death
C. causing any harm other than
death
D. causing any harm other than
death or grievous hurt.
Ans. B
457. In cases of assault with
intention of committing rape or of gratifying unnatural lust, the right of
private defence extends voluntarily:
A. causing any harm including
death
B. causing any harm other than
death
C. causing any harm other than
grievous hurt
D. both (b) & (c).
Ans. A
458. In cases of kidnapping
& abduction the right of private defence extends voluntarily causing:
A. any harm other than death
B. any harm other than death
& grievous hurt
C. any harm including death
D. both (a) & (b).
Ans. C
459. In cases of robbery or
dacoity, the right of private defence extends voluntarily causing:
A. any harm including death
B. any harm other than death
C. any harm other than grievous
hurt
D. both (b) & (c).
Ans. A
460. Where a wrong doer commits
house breaking by night, the right to private defence extends to voluntarily
causing:
A. any harm other than death
B. any harm including death
C. any harm other than death and
grievous hurt
D. either (a) or (c).
Ans. B
461. Where a wrong leads to
mischief by fire on a building used as a human dwelling or a place for custody
of property the right of private defence extends voluntarily causing:
A. any harm including death
B. any harm other than death
C. any harm other than death
& grievous hurt
D. either (b) or (c).
Ans. A
462. Under section 102 of IPC
the right to private defence of the body:
A. commences as soon as a
reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises and continues as long as
that apprehension continues
B. commences as soon as a
reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises and continues even after
that apprehension ceases
C. commences only when the
assault is actually done & continues during the period of assault
D. commences only when the
assault is actually done & continues after the assailant has left.
Ans. A
463. Under section 105 of IPC,
the right of private defence of property in cases of theft commences when a
reasonable apprehension of danger to the property commences and:
A. continues till the offender
has effected his retreat with the property
B. continues till the assistance
of public authorities is obtained
C. continues till the property
has been recovered
D. all the above.
Ans. D
464. Section 106 of IPC extends
the right of private defence, in case of apprehension of death, to causing:
A. any harm other than death to
any innocent person
B. any harm other than grievous
hurt to any innocent person
C. any harm including death to
any innocent person
D. none of the above.
Ans. C
465. Chapter V of Indian
Penal Code deals with:
A. abetment
B. attempt
C. elections
D. religion.
Ans. A
466. Right of private defence is
not available:
A. against any act which in
itself is not an offence
B. against any act which is not
legal wrong
C. against any act which is a
moral wrong
D. all the above.
Ans. D
467. Section 97 of IPC extends
the right of private defence of property, to the offence of:
A. cheating
B. misappropriation
C. theft & robbery
D. criminal breach of trust.
Ans. C
468. Abetment under section 107
of IPC can be constituted by:
A. instigation
B. conspiracy
C. intentional aid
D. all the above.
Ans. D
469. Abettor is a person:
A. who commits the offence
B. who instigates the commission
of offence
C. against whom the offence is
committed
D. who is innocent.
Ans. B
470. For abetment:
A. it is necessary that the act
abetted should be committed successfully
B. it is necessary that the act
abetted should be committed though unsuccessfully
C. it is not necessary that the
act abetted should be committed
D. both (a) & (b).
Ans. C
471. For abetment:
A. it is necessary that the
person abetted should be capable of committing on offence under the law
B. it is necessary that the
person abetted should have the same guilty intention
C. it is not necessary that the
person abetted should be capable of committing an offence under the law or
should have the same guilty intention
D. both (a) & (b).
Ans. C
472. Under Indian Penal Code,
there can be abetment to:
A. a person of unsound mind
B. an infant
C. both (a) & (b)
D. neither (a) nor (b).
Ans. C
473. Abetment of an offence is:
A. always an offence
B. never an offence
C. may be an offence depending
on the circumstances but not always
D. may not be an offence
depending on the circumstances.
Ans. A
474. If the act abetted is committed
in consequence, the abettor is punishable with punishment provided for the
offence:
A. if the offence committed is
the same as abetted
B. if the offence committed is
different from the one abetted, for the offence committed
C. if the doer commits the
offence with different intention than the abettor
D. all the above.
Ans. D
475. Abetment by instigation may
be:
A. by words spoken
B. by letters
C. by conduct
D. all the above.
Ans. D
476. Abetment is complete as
soon as:
A. the abettor has incited
another to commit an offence
B. the person instigated has
done some overt act towards the commission of the offence
C. the offence abetted has been
committed
D. both (b) & (c) above.
Ans. A
477. X ordered his employee Y to
beat Z. Y refuses. Now:
A. X has committed abetment
& Y has committed assault
B. X has committed abetment
& Y has committed no offence
C. X & Y both have committed
no offence
D. X has committed no offence
but Y has committed offence of subordination.
Ans. B
478. No criminal liability for
abetment arises:
A. if the act abetted is an
offence
B. if the act abetted is not an
offence
C. if the act abetted is morally
wrong
D. both (b) & (c).
Ans. D
479. Conspiracy has been defined
as an agreement between two or more persons to do an illegal act or an act
which is not illegal by illegal means, under:
A. section 120B of IPC
B. section 120A of IPC
C. section 120 of IPC
D. section 121A of IPC.
Ans. B
480. For conspiracy, the minimum
number of persons required is:
A. one
B. five
C. two
D. no minimum requirement.
Ans. C
481. Under criminal conspiracy:
A. mere agreement is made an
offence even if no step is taken to carry out that agreement
B. mere agreement is not made an
offence unless a step is taken to carry out that agreement
C. both (a) & (b) are
correct.
D. neither (a) nor (b) is
correct.
Ans. A
482. Conspiracy to wage war
against Government of India has been dealt with under:
A. section 120 of IPC
B. section 120A of IPC
C. section 120B of IPC
D. section 121A of IPC.
Ans. D
483. Sedition has been defined
as bringing or attempt to bring hatred or contempt, or exciting or attempt to
excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in India, by
words, either spoken or written, or by signs or visible representation or
otherwise, under:
A. section 120 of IPC
B. section 120A of IPC
C. section 121A of IPC
D. section 124A of IPC.
Ans. D
484. Disaffection within section
124A of IPC includes:
A. disloyalty and all feelings
of enmity
B. disapprobation of the
measures of the Government not exciting any contempt
C. disapprobation of the
administrative measures
D. all the above.
Ans. A
485. For an unlawful assembly
under section 141 of IPC, the minimum number of persons required is:
A. five
B. seven
C. ten
D. twenty.
Ans. A
486. For an assembly to be
unlawful, must have a common object of the kind specified in:
A. section 141 of IPC
B. section 140 of IPC
C. section 142 of IPC
D. section 144 of IPC.
Ans. A
487. Which of the following is
not specified to be the common object of an assembly to make it unlawful,
under section 141 of IPC:
A. overawing the Government or
its officers
B. resistance to legal process
C. forcible possession or
dispossession of property
D. none of the above.
Ans. D
488. In which recent case the
meaning and rationale of “preventive detection” is being discussed in the
Constitution or statute:
A. State of Maharashtra v.
Bhalurao Runjabrao Gawande
B. Rajinder Arora v. Union of
India.
C. Naresh Kumar Goel v. Union of
India
D. A.K. Ray v. Union of India.
Ans. A
489. Article 21 now protects the
right to life and personal liberty of citizens not only from executive action
but also from legislative action. The case is:
A. Minerva Mills
B. A.K. Gopalan
C. Maneka Gandhi
D. Keshvananda Bharti.
Ans. C
490. Under Indian Constitution
which is not a specific ground on which the State can place restriction on
freedom of religion:
A. public order
B. morality
C. social Justice
D. health.
Ans. C
491. Arrange the decisions of
the Supreme Court on Fundamental Right relating to personal liberty in correct
chronological sequence:
(1) Maneka Gandhi v. UOI
(2) A.DM fabalpur v. Shiv Kant
Shukla
(3) A.K. Gopalan v. State of
Madras
Codes –
A. 3, 2, 1.
B. 2, 1, 3
C. 2, 3, 1
D. 1, 2, 3.
Ans. A
492. An accused person has been
provided with the following protections by Constitution of India:
(1) ex post facto law
(2) safeguard against arrest and
detention
(3) double jeopardy
Codes –
A. 1, 3, 2
B. 1, 2, 3
C. 3, 1, 2
D. 2, 1, 3
Ans. A
493. Two persons namely J and N
who received different kinds of injuries by different kinds of weapons
succumbed to the injuries and another person Y was seriously wounded on
receiving different kinds of injuries. Seven persons were accused in this case.
The defence plea was that only two accused persons were there along with the
victim who attacked the two accused persons who caused death of the victim in
self defence. Which of the following Court gave the appropriate verdict?
A. Court A overruled the plea of
self defence convicted the seven accused persons.
B. Court B reversed the Court
A’s decision and accepted the plea of private defence
C. Court C reversed the Court
B’s decision and convicted all the seven persons
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans. D
494. Z under the influence of
madness attempts to kill A.
A. Z is not guilty
B. A has the same right of
private defence as Z
C. Z is guilty
D. Both (A) and (B)
Ans. D
495. Same offence with
concealment of the former marriage from the person with whom subsequent
marriage is contracted is dealt under-
A. Section 493 of IPC
B. Section 494 of IPC
C. Section 495 of IPC
D. Section 496 of IPC
Ans. C
496. Adultery is dealt under-
A. Section 497 of IPC
B. Section 498 of IPC
C. Section 498A of IPC
D. Section 500 of IPC
Ans. A
497. The accused discharged the
first shot as he was about to be assaulted after his father had been struck to
death. The assailants had come armed with both sticks and battle- axes. The
only weapon in the hand of the accused was a gun.
A. the accused rightly exercised
the right of private defence
B. the ingredients of Section
106, IPC are fully satisfied
C. neither (A) nor (B)
D. both (A) and (B)
Ans. D
498. Failure to keep election
accounts is dealt under-
A. Section 170 F of IPC
B. Section 170 G of IPC
C. Section 171 H of IPC
D. Section 171 I of IPC
Ans. D
499. Non-appearance in a case
where declaration has been made under sub-section (4) of section 82 of this
Code pronouncing a person as proclaimed offender is dealt under-
A. Section 171-A of IPC
B. Section 172-A of IPC
C. Section 173-A of IPC
D. Section 174-A of IPC
Ans. D
500. Refusing oath when duly
require to take oath by public servant is dealt under-
A. Section 175 of IPC
B. Section 176 of IPC
C. Section 177 of IPC
D. Section 178 of IPC
Ans. D
501. Refusing to sign a
statement made to a public servant when legally required to do so is dealt
under-
A. Section 169 of IPC
B. Section 180 of IPC
C. Section 171 of IPC
D. Section 172 of IPC
Ans. B
502. Giving false information to
a public servant in order to cause him to use his lawful power to the injury or
annoyance of any person is dealt under-
A. Section 180 of IPC
B. Section 181 of IPC
C. Section 182 of IPC
D. Section 183 of IPC
Ans. D
503. Obstructing sale of
property offered for sale by authority of a public servant is dealt under-
A. Section 183 of IPC
B. Section 184 of IPC
C. Section 185 of IPC
D. Section 186 of IPC
Ans. B
504. If summons or notice
requires attendance in person etc., in a court of justice is dealt under-
A. Section 171 of IPC
B. Section 172 of IPC
C. Section 173 of IPC
D. Section 174 of IPC
Ans. B
505. Which of the following is
not a part of Section 73, IPC?
A. a time of solitary
confinement not exceeding one month shall not exceed six months
B. a time of solitary
confinement not exceeding two months shall exceed six months but not one year
C. a time of solitary
confinement not exceeding three months shall exceed one year
D. a time of solitary
confinement not exceeding four months shall exceed one year but not 2 years
Ans. D
506. Which of the following is
needed to bring an offence within the terms of Section 75, IPC?
A. it must be one under either
Chapter XII or Chapter XVIII of the Code
B. the previous conviction must
have been for an offence therein punishable with imprisonment for not less than
three years
C. the subsequent offence must
also be punishable with imprisonment for not less than three years
D. all of them
Ans. D
507. In which of the following
way Section 76, IPC and Section 79, IPC differs from one another?
A. In the Section 76, IPC a
person is assumed to be bound while in Section 79, IPC, the person is assumed
to be justified by law
B. In the Section 76, IPC a
person is assumed to be justified while in Section 79, IPC, the person is
assumed to be bound by law
C. In the Section 76, IPC a
person is assumed to be both bound and justified while in Section 79, IPC, the
person is assumed only to be bound by law
D. None of them
Ans. A
508. Wrongful confinement for
the purpose of extorting confession or information, or of compelling
restoration of property, etc. is dealt under-
A. Section 346 of IPC
B. Section 347 of IPC
C. Section 348 of IPC
D. Section 349 of IPC
Ans. C
509. In case the accused is not
able to establish conclusively that he was insane at the time he committed the
offence, which of the following will be true to entitle the Court to acquit the
accused on the ground that the general burden of proof resting on the
prosecution was not discharged?
A. the evidence placed before
the Court by the accused may raise a reasonable doubt in the mind of the Court
as regards one or more of the ingredients of the offence including mens rea of
the accused
B. the evidence placed before
the Court by the prosecution may raise a reasonable doubt in the mind of the
Court as regards one or more of the ingredients of the offence including mens
rea of the accused
C. Either (A) or (B)
D. None of then
Ans. C
510. It was found that
disclosure statement made by the deceased led to the recovery of gold ornaments
worn by the deceased, weapons used in crime and blood stained clothes of
accused. In which of following cases the conviction was held by the court as proper
under Section 302 of IPC.?
A. Om Prakash v. State of
Haryana (1979)
B. Geijaganda Somaiah v. State
of Karnataka (2007)
C. Narayanan v. State of Kerala
(1987)
D. Mehtab Singh v. State of U.P
(1979)
Ans. B
511. Which of the following can
be categorised as types of insanity?
I. Melancholia
II. Mania
III. Monomania
IV. Dementia
V. Idiocy
A. I, IV and V
B. II, and V
C. III, IV and V
D. all of them
Ans. D
512. Robbery or dacoity, with
attempt to cause death or grievous hurt is dealt under-
A. Section 394 of IPC
B. Section 395 of IPC
C. Section 396 of IPC
D. Section 397 of IPC
Ans. C
513. Nothing is an offence which
is done by a person who at the time of doing it is by reason of intoxication
of, incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that he is doing what is
wrong, or contrary to the law, provided the intoxication was:
A. self-administered
B. administered against his
knowledge
C. administered against his will
D. both (B) and (C)
Ans. D
514. The rule volenti non fit
injura is based on which of the following proposition?
A. every person is the best
judge of his own interest
B. no man will consent to do what
he thinks is hurtful to himself
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. None of them
Ans. C
515. Unnatural offences is dealt
under-
A. Section 375 of IPC
B. Section 376 of IPC
C. Section 377 of IPC
D. Section 378 of IPC
Ans. C
516. Which of the following case
the exception in Section 89, IPC cannot be extended?
I. intentional causing of death
or to the attempting to cause death
II. doing of anything which the
person knows to be likely to cause death, for any purpose other than the
preventing of death or grievous hurt, or the curing of any grievous disease or
infirmity
III. voluntary causing of
grievous hurt or to the attempting to cause grievous hurt, unless it be for the
purpose of preventing of death or grievous hurt, or the curing of any grievous
disease or infirmity
IV. abetment of any offence
A. I, II and IV
B. III, IV and IV
C. IV only
D. all of them
Ans. D
517. The principal object of
Section 88, 89 and 92 of the IPC is:
A. protection of medical
practitioners
B. protection of chemists
C. protection of pharmacists
D. all of them
Ans. A
518. Section 94, IPC is based on
the principle:
A. actus reus invito (factus)
non est mens actus
B. mens rea invito (factus) non
est mens actus
C. actus me invito (factus) non
est mens actus
D. none of them
Ans. C
519. Theft in a building, tent
or vessel is dealt under-
A. Section 380 of IPC
B. Section 381 of IPC
C. Section 382 of IPC
D. Section 383 of IPC
Ans. A
520. Which of the following are
the limits which dictate the right of private defence?
A. that the same right is
claimed by all other members of the society
B. that it is the State which
generally undertakes the responsibility for the maintenance of law and order
C. Either (A) or (B)
D. Both of them
Ans. D
521. Right to private defence
cannot be used for which of the following purpose?
A. vindictive
B. aggressive
C. retributive
D. all of them
Ans. D
522. In which of the following
factor is important to appropriately determine the right to private defence?
I. the injuries received by the
accused
II. the immense of threat to his
safety
III. the injuries caused by the
accused
IV. the circumstances whether
the accused had time to recourse to public authorities
A. I
B. I, II
C. I, III, IV
D. I, II, III, IV
Ans. D
523. A instigates B to instigate
C to murder Z. B accordingly instigates C to murder Z, and C commits that
offence in consequence of B’s instigation.
A. Only A is liable to
punishment
B. Only B is liable to
punishment
C. Only C is liable to
punishment
D. all of them
Ans. D
524. Maiming a minor in order
that such minor may be
employed or used for purposes of begging is dealt under-
A. Section 362 A of IPC
B. Section 363 A of IPC
C. Section 364 A of IPC
D. Section 365 A of IPC
Ans. B
525. A instigates B to give
false evidence. B in consequence of the instigation commits that offence.
A. Only B is liable to the
punishment
B. A is not liable to same
punishment as B
C. A is guilty of abetment and
is liable to the same punishment as B
D. Both (A) and (C)
Ans. D
526. A instigates B to resist by
force a distress made by a public servant, knowing full well that B most likely
will cause hurt in the process. Hence B in consequence, resists that distress.
In offering the resistance, B voluntarily causes grievous hurt to the officer
executing the distress.
A. B is liable to punishment for
resisting the distress only
B. B is liable to punishment for
causing hurt
C. Both A and B are liable to
punishment for resisting the distress
D. Both A and B are responsible
for resisting the distress and causing hurt to A
Ans. D
527. A instigates B to murder Z.
However the offence is not committed. If B had murdered Z, which of the
following is true about this case?
A. He would be subject to death
penalty or life imprisonment
B. A would have been liable to a
term of seven years also to a fine
C. A would have been liable to a
life term including fine
D. All of them
Ans. D
528. Intercourse by a man with
his wife not being under twelve years of age is dealt under-
A. Section 375 of IPC
B. Section 376 of IPC
C. Section 377 of IPC
D. Section 378 of IPC
Ans. B
529. Consider the two cases:
I. A, a police officer, whose
duty is to prevent robbery, abets the commission of robbery. However the
robbery is not committed.
II. A, abets the commission of a
robbery by B, a police officer, who duty is to prevent the offence. However the
robbery is not committed.
Which of the following is true
about the above cases?
A. Only B is liable to one-half
of the longest term of imprisonment
B. A is liable to one-half of
the longest term of imprisonment provided for the offence of robbery and also
to fine
C. A is liable to a fine only
D. None of them
Ans. B
530. Theft after preparation
having been made for causing death, or hurt or restraint or fear of death, or
of hurt or of restraint, in order to the committing of such theft, or to
retiring after committing it, or to retaining property taken by it is dealt
under-
A. Section 380 of IPC
B. Section 381 of IPC
C. Section 382 of IPC
D. Section 383 of IPC
Ans. C
531. A, knowing that dacoity is
about to be committed at B, falsely informs the Magistrate that a dacoity is
about to be committed at C, a place in an opposite direction and thereby
misleads the Magistrate with intent to facilitate the commission of the
offence.
A. A should be punished under
Section 115, IPC
B. A should be punished under
Section 116, IPC
C. A should be punished under
Section 117, IPC
D. A should be punished under
Section 118, IPC
Ans. D
532. A being legally bound to
appear before the High Court at Calcutta, in obedience to a subpoena issuing
from that Court intentionally omits to appear.
A. A has committed an offence
under Section 174, IPC
B. A has committed an offence
under Section 175, IPC
C. A has committed an offence
under Section 176, IPC
D. A has committed an offence
under Section 177, IPC
Ans. A
533. Procreation of minor girl
is dealt under-
A. Section 364 A of IPC
B. Section 365 A of IPC
C. Section 366 A of IPC
D. Section 367 A of IPC
Ans. C
534. Intentional omission to
give information of an offence by a person legally bound to inform is dealt
under-
A. Section 202 of IPC
B. Section 203 of IPC
C. Section 204 of IPC
D. Section 205 of IPC
Ans. A
535. An order is promulgated by
a public servant lawfully empowered to promulgate such order, directing that a religious
procession shall not pass down a certain street. A knowingly disobeys the
order, and thereby causes danger of riot.
A. A has committed the offence
under Section 150, IPC
B. A has committed the offence
under Section 160, IPC
C. A has committed the offence
under Section 178, IPC
D. A has committed the offence
under Section 188, IPC
Ans. D
536. A, being bound by an oath
to state the truth, states that he believes a certain signature to be the
handwriting of Z, when he does not believe it to be the handwriting of Z. Here
if A gives evidence against Z then:
A. A’s evidence is true
B. A’s evidence is false
C. Z’s evidence is false
D. None of them
Ans. B
Comments
Post a Comment